French President Thanks UAE for ‘Joining the Movement’ in Setting Age Limits for...
Restroom Crisis for Dads: Viral Video Shows Why We Need More Family Bathrooms
Action News: Pixar Blazes New Trails for Diversity by Perfecting Curly Hair in...
UK City Council Launches Court Bid to Ban Union Jacks That ‘Intimidate Diverse...
You Got Nailed: Tom Hanks Drops a Funny on MS NOW's Ratings and...
Major Pakistani Donor to Zohran Mamdani & NYC Democrats Arrested in Massive $38M...
NBC News: Tiny Baseball Team Cancels Pride Night After Players Refuse to Wear...
Presidents (Minus Trump) Gather at Obama Library — Bush Suddenly Redeemed, Election Denier...
Deranged: Whoopi Wants Knicks to Visit White House for Slavery Reminder, Not Victory...
CNN: Trump Administration Plans to File at Least 250 Denaturalization Cases by October
Toot Suit Riot: Kevin Bacon Dons ‘Bean’ Blazer for Meatless Wednesdays, X Users...
Ben Rhodes Explains Difference Between Obama's Iran Deal and 'Whatever Trump Is Doing'
Democrats Swoon Over Ugandan-Born Socialist's Knicks Parade Speech, Immediately Demand He...
Poster Explains Bible Verses Are Overt Religious Symbols While Pride Hats Are Not
LA City Council Advances Proposal to Allow Non-Citizens to Vote in City Elections
Premium

Elon Musk: 'They Were Going to Destroy the Constitution'

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

Right after Donald Trump was inaugurated in 2017, I remember doing several posts about editorials and op-eds in major newspapers arguing that maybe the First Amendment wasn't all it was cracked up to be, and maybe freedom of speech wasn't such a good thing. It was ironic that the mainstream media, which depends on the First Amendment to operate, suddenly decided that maybe speech was a little too free.

We dodged a bullet by not electing Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. Harris told CNN's Jake Tapper that she was deeply concerned that social media users were "directly speaking to millions and millions of people without oversight.” And Walz made it clear that in his opinion free speech wasn't a guarantee that you could spread disinformation or hate speech. And who in their administration would be put in charge of overseeing social media and deciding what was disinformation? Fortunately, our Disinformation Governance Board was short-lived.

Elon Musk said in August that free speech was the bedrock of democracy. "The degree to which freedom of speech is being undermined around the world is extremely alarming," he said. I'm especially concerned about the United Kingdom's crackdown on free speech. You can go to prison for having a meme criticizing migrants on your phone. Check out this clown:

… an immediate custodial sentence is unavoidable.” 

The sentence would’ve been even longer if they pled not guilty.

So when Musk says they were going to destroy the Constitution, he wasn't wrong. Check out the headlines:

The New York Times: "The First Amendment Is Out of Control." Also the New York Times: "The Constitution is Sacred. Is It Also Dangerous?"

The answer to that second question is no. The Constitution is keeping judges from sending us to prison for social media posts. Democrats wanted to eliminate the filibuster, eliminate the Electoral College, pack the Supreme Court, and give Congress oversight of the Supreme Court. Yes, they were going to destroy the Constitution.

They really were. Democrats think the government is there to control the population, which is why they're so opposed to Trump's plan to shrink it. Musk is being given a great opportunity with the Department of Government Efficiency. It's good to know that he realizes the stakes.

***

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement