Dem Senator Who Was Feeling Good About Graham Platner Is Now Feeling Good...
Shackles Shakedown: Mayor Zohran Mamdani Is Open to Making New Yorkers Pay Slave...
The DSA’s Destructive Platform Exposes the Ignorance of Dem Leaders’ ‘Big Tent Party’...
Defiant Gov. Mikie Sherrill Says Registered Illegal Alien Voters Are ‘Citizens of New...
Daughter of Turkish President Wants to Decolonize the West, Adopt Ideas From Islam...
Berlin Pride Killer Attended Three-Day Deradicalization Course Run by Progressive White Wo...
He Preened While Families Buried Their Dead: an Unfiltered Response to the Fauci...
Man Who Dislikes Concept of Capitalism Just Wants to Make Art and Be...
Gavin Newsom’s Ex-Mistress Admits She Wet the Bed on Their First Night Together
Rashida Tlaib Is Concerned About Whom Haley Stevens Accepts Money
NYT Shocked: ICE Enforces Visa Laws at Airports—Foreigners With Expired Papers Actually De...
Berlin’s Queer Commissioner Says Far-Right Will Seize on Muslim Pride Attack to Demonize...
'If I Had to Ramble for 8 Hours': Adam Hamawy Excuses Hasan Piker’s...
Texas Rep. Files American Dream and Promise Act to Extend TPS Protections for...
Inside the U.S. Capitol: The Christian Heritage Hidden in Plain Sight
Premium

Elon Musk: 'They Were Going to Destroy the Constitution'

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

Right after Donald Trump was inaugurated in 2017, I remember doing several posts about editorials and op-eds in major newspapers arguing that maybe the First Amendment wasn't all it was cracked up to be, and maybe freedom of speech wasn't such a good thing. It was ironic that the mainstream media, which depends on the First Amendment to operate, suddenly decided that maybe speech was a little too free.

We dodged a bullet by not electing Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. Harris told CNN's Jake Tapper that she was deeply concerned that social media users were "directly speaking to millions and millions of people without oversight.” And Walz made it clear that in his opinion free speech wasn't a guarantee that you could spread disinformation or hate speech. And who in their administration would be put in charge of overseeing social media and deciding what was disinformation? Fortunately, our Disinformation Governance Board was short-lived.

Elon Musk said in August that free speech was the bedrock of democracy. "The degree to which freedom of speech is being undermined around the world is extremely alarming," he said. I'm especially concerned about the United Kingdom's crackdown on free speech. You can go to prison for having a meme criticizing migrants on your phone. Check out this clown:

… an immediate custodial sentence is unavoidable.” 

The sentence would’ve been even longer if they pled not guilty.

So when Musk says they were going to destroy the Constitution, he wasn't wrong. Check out the headlines:

The New York Times: "The First Amendment Is Out of Control." Also the New York Times: "The Constitution is Sacred. Is It Also Dangerous?"

The answer to that second question is no. The Constitution is keeping judges from sending us to prison for social media posts. Democrats wanted to eliminate the filibuster, eliminate the Electoral College, pack the Supreme Court, and give Congress oversight of the Supreme Court. Yes, they were going to destroy the Constitution.

They really were. Democrats think the government is there to control the population, which is why they're so opposed to Trump's plan to shrink it. Musk is being given a great opportunity with the Department of Government Efficiency. It's good to know that he realizes the stakes.

***

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos