'We're Going to Lose a Major War': U.S. Navy Goes Full Woke With...
WATCH: Speaking on 2nd Assassination Attempt, DeSantis Reminds Us Why He’s One of...
Wait, What Did Rep. Plaskett Say About Trump? (Watch)
John Bolton Seems to Be Hoping For World War III and It's Just...
Hillary Clinton Publicly Offers Kamala Her 'Help' and Twitter Wonders What Exactly That...
'On Our Radar' - Trump Shooter Was Known to The FBI
Tom Nichols Would Appreciate if Donald Trump Would Stop Complaining About All the...
MEMORY HOLED: Here's a Reminder Newsweek Said Trump Supporters Were 'Highly Likely to...
This Is Fine! Biden-Harris Economy Sees Layoffs JUMP in August and Hiring at...
Trump Assassination Attempt Brings Out The Worst of Media But the BEST from...
Donald Trump Jr. Rightly FED UP With Having to Tell His Kids Someone...
Line to APOLOGIZE to Trump Forms to the RIGHT: Ohio Governor Says All...
Charles C.W. Cooke Notices the 'Stochastic Terrorism' Crowd Is AWFULLY Quiet Today
BUH BYE: Pathetic, Elon Musk-Hating Tyrant Thierry Breton Resigns As EU Commissioner
Trump Campaign 'Broke Out Every Receipt in the World' to Name and Shame...

MSNBC Political Analyst Urges Moderaters Not to Try to Be Balanced

Journalism meme

There was a trend that started shortly after President Donald Trump's inauguration. Outlets including the Washington Post started publishing opinion pieces about how unfettered free speech might not be that great of an idea. The press was actually writing in favor of censoring themselves.

Advertisement

That led to a debate over "both-sidesism." Are impartial journalists really supposed to present both sides of an issue? What if one side, say Trump and the Republicans, were lying or spreading disinformation? What if one side, usually the Democrats, is clearly right? Is the press obligated to give equal time to the lie?

Back in 2021, Matthew Dowd, who considers himself a proud independent, challenged his media colleagues to stop treating Republicans like they’re anything other than “insane.” "You don't talk to crazy people," he explained.

There's a debate tonight on ABC. Republicans haven't always had the best luck with debate moderators, like Candy Crowley and John Harwood. Trump's debate with President Joe Biden was moderated by CNN's Dana Loesch and Jake Tapper, both of who'd done segments on how Trump's rhetoric was more and more like that of Adolf Hitler. (To be fair, this editor thought Tapper conducted himself pretty well.)

Former Obama administration lackey, TIME Magazine editor, and CNN political analyst Richard Stengel has a problem with balance: he's afraid that tonight's debate moderators, ABC News' David Muir and Linsey Davis, might feel obligated to offer some balance to the proceedings.

Advertisement

Got that, moderators? Your job tonight is to protect democracy.

"… re: Covid and Joe Biden’s cognitive health. We are also aware of how those 'facts' played out. Their recent record as arbiters of truth, frankly, stinks."

Biden's a pathological liar. To this day he and what was his campaign promote the hoaxes that Trump told Americans to inject bleach and said that neo-Nazis were "very fine people." And the press never calls him out on it.

Advertisement

If the cable news networks want (and they probably will), they can "fact-check" the candidates after the debate is over — the moderators are there to ask questions.

Does he seriously believe the moderators don't have a horse in this race? The Media Research Center recently gave ABC News a 100% positive spin rating on coverage of Harris, and a 93 percent negative score for Trump.

Advertisement

Liberal Dan Rather is the godfather of fake news, creating the idea of "fake but accurate" in a hit piece on George W. Bush.

That's why the opponent is given time to respond. Let the moderators ask the questions and keep time. "Fact-check" all you want afterward.

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement