Abortion and COVID Obsessed Doctor Wonders How the Election is Even Close
Even Our Dogs Know: A Vote for Trump Is a Vote For America...
Arizona -- What All the Data Shows With Less Than 24 Hours to...
American Hero Perishes in Controversial Biden/Harris Authorized Gaza Pier Mission
BREAKING: Huge News as Joe Rogan Officially Endorses Donald Trump
JD Vance Demonstrates Shrinkflation Under Biden-Harris
Former Obama Spokesman Sad That Megyn Kelly Fell for Russian Disinformation About Doug...
New York Times Thinks Biden's Legacy Will Be His Success in Lowering Border...
Down Ballot Deep Dive: It's The Bottom of the 9th in Pennsylvania, Will...
Whoopi Goldberg Would Like to See Liz Cheney Head the FBI or CIA
Musk at Dusk: Joe Rogan Drops Surprise Podcast Interview with Elon on Eve...
Go Vote and Keep the Faith
WATCH: Former VP Candidate Nicole Shanahan Shares Inspiring 'Unity 2024' Ad
PERFECT: Kamala's Closing Message in Pennsylvania is EVERY BIT as Cringe as Her...
Professor Says to Remember January 6 in the Voting Booth

The Atlantic: ‘Sometimes You Just Have to Ignore the Economists’

Meme screenshot

Last Friday, presidential candidate Kamala Harris did something new: she revealed some of her policies. This was her briefing on her economic policies, and she promised to stop price gouging and implement Soviet-style price controls. Even the Washington Post editorial board and CNN said Harris' price control policy would harm the economy.

Advertisement

The Atlantic has a piece out defending Harris' economic policy, saying that though it might irritate some academics, sometimes you just have to ignore the economists.

Zephyr Teachout writes:

Last week, the economics commentariat and much of the mainstream media erupted with contempt toward Kamala Harris’s proposed federal price-gouging law. Op-eds, social-media posts, and straight news reports mocked Harris for economically illiterate pandering and warned of Soviet-style “price controls” that would lead to shortages and runaway inflation.

The strange thing about these complaints is that what Harris actually proposed was neither radical nor new—and it certainly wasn’t price controls. In fact, almost every state already has a law restricting at least some forms of price gouging. Although Harris has not specified the exact design of her proposal, one hopes that it would follow the basic outline of state-level bans: forbidding unwarranted price hikes for necessary goods during emergencies.

Why is price controls in quotation marks? She certainly did call for price controls. The gist of the piece is about price gouging in the sense of hiking prices during an emergency situation, like a pandemic or a blizzard.

During a rare blizzard, sellers might jack up the prices of snowblowers. But investors aren’t going to set up a new snowblower-manufacturing hub based on a blizzard, because by the time they had any inventory to sell, the snow would long be melted. So after the disruption, all goes back to normal—except with a big wealth transfer from the public to the company that raised prices.

Advertisement

As Teachout reports, "almost every state already has a law restricting at least some forms of price gouging." So why is Harris focused on that along with price controls?

Price gouging isn't new to this administration — President Joe Biden accused gas stations of price gouging during "Putin's price hike." That's why you were paying $6 a gallon for gas — price gouging.

Advertisement

Truth.

People are hurting from inflation, so price controls will bring them joy.

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement