Sheer Panda-monium in China: Taizhou Zoo Unveils Unique New 'Panda Exhibit'
Politico: ‘Swagger’ Was Once Journalism’s Calling Card
AGHamilton Shares Poignant and Personal Insight into the Jewish Experience After October 7
Brian Krassenstein Tries to White Knight for Kathy Hochul After Racist Computer Remark
Randi Weingarten Horrified by School Closures - In Gaza
John Fetterman Should Be Awarded Ownership of TikTok After this Sick Twitter Burn
Politico: Biden Administration Holding Up Delivery of Bombs to Israel to Send a...
John Kirby Says You Can't Eliminate Hamas Through Military Operations
Kristi Noem and Fox Host Engage in Heated Verbal Sparring Match About her...
What Could POSSIBLY Go Wrong?! Denver Sets Up Hotline for Residents to Host...
Biden: Not Only Did Illegal Immigrants Build This Country, They’re Also Model Citizens
One of Biden's Illegal Immigrants Picked the Wrong State to Terrorize a Young...
WOMP WOMP: Jeff Bezos Invested $60 MILLION in Florida Lab-Grown Meat Before DeSantis...
Northwestern Teaching Assistant Blames 'the Jews' for the Latest Crop of Anti-Semites
Donald Trump's Classified Documents Case Delayed 'Indefinitely'

Border Bill Gives US District Court in DC 'Sole and Original Jurisdiction' Over Challenges to Law

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

There are so many reasons to vote against the Senate's bipartisan border control (and Ukraine-funding) bill. Republican Rep. Sen. James Lankford is responsible for half of this mess along with Sen. Chuck Schumer, and he's been online for a good part of the day trying to convince us that the bill doesn't allow 5,000 illegal immigrants to cross every day; it closes the border and turns 5,000 around, he claims. No, it does not close the border. 

Advertisement

We've already run a piece on a damning thread complete with screenshots from the legislation. Rep. Dan Bishop of North Carolina has put together his own thread explaining why he's giving the bill a hard pass, and one of those reasons is that any challenges to the law would be heard by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia — in other words, D.C. and not the border states would be decided what's allowed and what's not.

Advertisement


Advertisement

This alone should be a non-starter. Any Republican who agrees to this is an idiot or a traitor.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.  Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement