Ship Has SAILED: Bill Melugin Explains How Democrats Lost AGAIN With Senate Passing...
Sen. Ted Cruz Helps Media Make Their Headlines About Chuck Schumer and Photo...
FINISH THEM! Scott Bessent BODIES Financial Times for Pushing Explicitly FALSE Story About...
JB Pritzker Blasted for What's NOT Mentioned in His Post About Firefighter Who...
OOF: Hakeem Jeffries Thinks Democrats Won the DHS Funding Battle, but Ultimately They...
Is There a Second Sunken Sphinx? Speculation Abounds as Twitter Fun Ensues
The Rise of Public Schools in the American Nation: When and Why They...
You're Not the 51st State (Yet): Toronto Mayor Goes on Bizarre Rant Demanding...
From Gifts and Games to Pure Evil: The Vile Leftist Comments on Karoline...
Broom Schtick: ‘Black Snape’ Memes Explode Online After AI-Generated Rap Video Goes Viral
The Economist: Soaring Number of Canadian Muslim Schools Traced to Islamophobia
SCHUMER SHUTDOWN SALE: 60% Off VIP Memberships!
The Economist: A Month of Bombing Iran Has Achieved Nothing
WSJ: Cancellation of Student Visas Has Left Africa’s Brightest With Broken Dreams
Dems Shut Down Govt, TSA Goes Unpaid — CNN Mad at Rick Scott...

Border Bill Gives US District Court in DC 'Sole and Original Jurisdiction' Over Challenges to Law

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

There are so many reasons to vote against the Senate's bipartisan border control (and Ukraine-funding) bill. Republican Rep. Sen. James Lankford is responsible for half of this mess along with Sen. Chuck Schumer, and he's been online for a good part of the day trying to convince us that the bill doesn't allow 5,000 illegal immigrants to cross every day; it closes the border and turns 5,000 around, he claims. No, it does not close the border. 

Advertisement

We've already run a piece on a damning thread complete with screenshots from the legislation. Rep. Dan Bishop of North Carolina has put together his own thread explaining why he's giving the bill a hard pass, and one of those reasons is that any challenges to the law would be heard by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia — in other words, D.C. and not the border states would be decided what's allowed and what's not.

Advertisement


Advertisement

This alone should be a non-starter. Any Republican who agrees to this is an idiot or a traitor.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.  Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos