Just. WOW: DNC War Room Learns the Hard Way What FAFO Means After...
Three Simple Tweets Prove Without a DOUBT How Much the Biden Admin Actually...
'All PLANNED': Wokal Distance OWNS Protesters in EPIC Thread About Encampments (and Shutti...
Best and Brightest: Columbia Students Spell Palestine Wrong
'Keep Our Language OUT of Your Mouth': AOC Pisses X Off With Impressively...
'Swarmed by an Angry Mob': Custodian at Columbia University Speaks Out to The...
Little Davy Wants a Choo-Choo: Life Failure David Hogg Joins the High-Speed Rail...
Just for Fun: Let's Make Fun of the 2024 Met Gala
'60 Minutes' Discovers New Concepts in Education - High Expectations and Discipline
Cosplaying Student Activists, Including Feminists, Seem to Be Converting to Islam
AP Reports on Donald Trump Using Another Nazi Reference
Pinko Tries to Sell the Benefits of Communism with Promises of... Bigger Pockets...
Here's a Collection of All the IDs That Foreign Nationals Have Ditched Before...
Obama Bro Tommy Vietor Says It's Hard to Overstate How Catastrophic a Rafah...
Commie Clash: Cruddy Keffiyeh-Clad Libs Converge on Conceited Costume-Clad Libs at the Met...

NBC News' fact-check of Ketanji Brown Jackson's 'twisted' record notes it's 'not a radical view' that some child-sex offenders may have nonsexual motivations

All eyes are on Sen. Josh Hawley during the confirmation hearings for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson and “we should all prepare for his funeral tomorrow.” Hawley made waves with a Twitter thread “cherry-picking” from Jackson’s record and speeches and suggesting she might be soft on sexual offenders where children are involved. Hawley’s sticking by his thread with a retweet of the Washington Examiner.

Advertisement

We’re not sure if this fact-check was done by NBC News and picked up by NBC Chicago or if NBC Chicago did it, but either way, Will Weissert and Calvin Woodward make it clear that Republicans are “twisting” Jackson’s record.

So? What about Hawley’s claim that Jackson has sentenced child sex offenders to sentences shorter than the suggested minimum guidelines? Our fact-checkers write:

She told the [sentencing] hearing she was surprised at a Justice Department expert’s testimony that, as she put it, some child-sex offenders may actually “not be pedophiles” but perhaps “loners” looking for like-minded company in child pornography circles. Being surprised by an assertion and wanting to know more are not the same as endorsing it.

From those questions, Hawley extrapolated that Jackson had drawn conclusions, when she hadn’t.

But several behavioral science researchers testified at that hearing that there may be nonsexual motivations among a portion of child-sex criminals. It is not a radical view. And many judges do see a distinction between those who produce child pornography and those who receive it.

It’s not a radical view among some researchers that pedophilia isn’t a crime but just another misunderstood sexual orientation. Salon was blasted last fall for “trying to mainstream pedophilia” in an article titled, “I’m a pedophile, but not a monster.” Just this January, USA Today wrote that “there’s a lot we’re misunderstanding” about pedophilia. Slate pondered if pedophilia was a crime to be punished. We note that the New York Times has deleted its repugnant headline about pedophilia. Into the memory hole it goes, along with Salon’s articles.

Advertisement

So yeah, maybe she was just asking questions. That still doesn’t explain the under-sentencing of sex offenders noted in Hawley’s thread. Is it really so wrong for senators to want to clarify a Supreme Court nominee’s thinking on the issue?

Advertisement

It really isn’t a fact-check at all. Take the specific cases Hawley cited, and then “fact-check” whether or not Jackson was lenient in her sentencing.


Related:

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement