Trump Denies Some Corporate Media Credentials to Tonight's (Hopefully!) Victory Party
LIVE: Election Night 2024
CBS News Reminds Voters That Election Disinformation Doesn't End After You Cast Your...
Andrew Mitchell Plays the Misogyny Card HARD When Explaining Kamala's Struggle With Male...
Silent Majority? Quiet Trump Voters are Making a Big Noise at the Ballot...
Dr. Jill Biden Just Voted in Delaware, but for Whom?
CNN's Chris Wallace Says It Would Take a 'Miracle' for Kamala to Win...
Dana Bash Thinks the SITTING VP Didn't Have Time to Introduce Herself to...
President Joe Biden Won't Be Attending His Vice President's Watch Party
Pennsylvania County Wants Election Judge Removed for Illegally Demanding Hand Counts of Ba...
Dairy State Dispatch: RNC Scores HUGE Win in City of Milwaukee Poll Watcher...
Maryland Governor Explains How the Bible Encourages Him to Fight for Abortion
Just Like Old Times: Democrat Woman Wears Robe and Pointy Hat to the...
Bureaucracy Is On the Ballot! Amazing A.I. Video Shows What Democrats Are REALLY...
Don Lemon Gives a Hug to a Terrified Transgender Woman

Oberlin College administrators were in even deeper than reported in case against family bakery

As Twitchy recently reported, über-liberal Oberlin College was recently ordered to pay the maximum of $33 million in damages to the owners of Gibson’s Bakery. In short, an employee at the business stopped three black Oberlin students from shoplifting alcohol. The super-woke Oberlin student body decided to protest in front of the bakery and organize a boycott, accusing the owners of having a long history of racial profiling.

Advertisement

Except they didn’t. And they proved it in court. What was the reason for the college cutting business ties with the bakery they’d done business with for more than a century? Administrators’ emails showed they were afraid their little snowflakes would “have a tantrum.” Police didn’t exactly buy that school administrators were just “chaperoning” students at the protests blocking the bakery, either.

Now, we’re learning even more about why that verdict was just thanks to a piece in The Atlantic.

Conor Friedersdorf reports:

The lawsuit goes on to allege that when David Gibson sat down with administrators to tell them about the devastating effect that defamation, boycotts, demonstrations, and refusal to do business with Gibson’s were having on his family’s store, Oberlin administrators sought to negotiate special treatment for shoplifting students in exchange for resuming relations with the bakery.

Advertisement

In short, Oberlin administrators said they’d consider resuming business with the bakery if the bakery would agree to not push criminal charges on first-time shoplifters; that would solve the “profiling” problem.

Even worse, the lawsuit alleged that “credit was given to students who attended the protest in lieu of classes, and administrators bought them food to support them.”

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement