We Saw It, So You Have To: Abdul El-Sayed Dances to Whitney Houston...
Tara Palmeri’s ‘My Notes Disagree’ Defense After Betraying Kat Cammack Is Peak Media...
Anti-Semite Hasan Piker Goes on Foul-Mouthed Rant, Vows to Destroy Rep. Ritchie Torres...
Guess What Dems Are Saying About Haiti Now After Clutching Pearls When Trump...
Scott Jennings Turns NY Lefty Into Sputtering MESS Asking Why a Coffee Shop...
Welcome to Congress, Comrade: Darializa Avila Chevalier Refuses to Disavow Communism
'Let Us Know How it GOES': Dan Bongino's BRUTAL Letter to Socialists Hits...
DON'T You Point Your Finger AT ME! Hearing ERUPTS as DHS Sec. Mullin...
Hakeem Jeffries Caught: His Future Is Ruined
Elizabeth Warren's on the Warpath After SCOTUS Allows Trump to Enforce the 'T'...
Hakeem Jeffries' Horrible, Terrible, No-Good, VERY BAD Week Just Got Worse As CNBC...
DSA Shares Wild (TERRIFYING) STAT About How Much of NYC They Control, Threatens...
GRRL, WHAT?! LOL! Michelle Obama’s Cringey President Barack Worship-Fest Goes SO Very Wron...
C-SPAN Caller Makes Dem Rep Squirm (and Say the Quiet Part Out Loud)...
No Big Whoop, Just the DSA Co-Chair LITERALLY Spilling the Tea on How...

Were FBI agents 'pulling punches' on the Hillary Clinton investigation? More texts released

As Twitchy reported Thursday morning, the Justice Department recovered those missing texts between FBI agent Peter Strzok and lawyer Lisa Page, and they raise some very serious questions about how the FBI treated its investigation of Hillary Clinton and her handling of classified documents.

Advertisement

As The Daily Caller reports, Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley says the texts suggest the FBI was “pulling punches” in its investigation of Clinton.

In the text message flagged by Grassley, Page suggested that Strzok should not take an aggressive approach to Clinton because of the strong possibility that she would be elected president.

“One more thing: she might be our next president. The last thing you need us going in there loaded for bear. You think she’s going to remember or care that it was more doj than fbi?” Page wrote.

Strzok said he agreed with that assessment.

“I called Bill and relayed what we discussed. He agrees. I will email you and [redacted] same.”

“Bill” is likely Bill Priestap, the FBI’s chief of counterintelligence.

The more that’s uncovered, the more it seems people were really, really counting on Hillary Clinton being elected.

Advertisement

CNN adds:

In other exchanges, in March and May of 2016, the pair reference an internal FBI discussion about a potential “special prosecutor” that was making top bureau officials “stressed.” The texts came as public pressure was mounting from Republicans on Capitol Hill to appoint a special counsel or prosecutor in the Clinton case.

Internal FBI discussions about the need for a special prosecutor have not been previously detailed.

Even CNN’s Chris Cillizza agrees that these newly uncovered texts are bad news for the FBI.

https://twitter.com/MattWolking/status/956655896767102976

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/Gooms/status/956702432758710272

Don’t forget: In December, CNN reported that Strzok was the one who softened the language in James Comey’s draft of his decision on the Clinton case from “grossly negligent,” a phrase with legal implications for Clinton, to “extremely careless.”

https://twitter.com/est1608/status/956666240654700545

https://twitter.com/SecBlasphemy/status/956682835250860043

Advertisement

We haven’t seen James Comey tweet any quotes tonight, but we’ll be keeping an eye out in case he has something to add.


Related:

‘Pretty damning’: FBI agent dismissed from Mueller probe did what?

Did Peter Strzok suspect ‘there’s no big there there’ in the Russian collusion investigation?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos