Ron DeSantis' 'Signed, Sealed and Delivered' Florida Map Is a Lock to Mega-Trigger...
WWI and the Power of Prayer
All Gas, No Brains: Jessica Tarlov's Golden Era Dig at Trump Over Gas...
Pete Buttigieg Has a Self-Awareness Rake Stomp in Rush to Blame Trump for...
Scott Jennings' Response to Keith Olbermann Getting All Big and Bad About Getting...
James Comey Thought He Was Safe. Todd Blanche Has Other Plans.
Judge in Hearing for Would-Be Trump Assassin Issues an Apology... to the Gunman...
The Jig Is UP! Post Sharing CRAZY Details on Graham Platner's History Makes...
Tucker Carlson, Bro, Blink TWICE If You Need Help
New MI Poll TRIGGERS Dem Abdul El-Sayed and HOOBOY, His Seriously Poor Choice...
'Way to Go, Chief'! ANOTHER Spirited Take From Elizabeth Warren Has Aged Like...
WOW: Luke Rosiak Shares DAMNING, Receipt-Filled Thread Exposing MASSIVE Medicaid Fraud (BI...
Adam Schiff Would Support Suspending California's Gas Tax IF It Was Replaced With...
Move Over Jeffrey Toobin --> More Eric Swalwell Evidence Turns Up and YIKES,...
Stupid or LYING? YOU Decide! This Claim About Trump Voters from AOC Could...

We thought they loved science: Slate, Salon declare pseudoscience behind Google memo 'terrible,' 'flawed'

As Twitchy reported, those who actually read the text of that controversial memo that convinced Google to fire James Damore were surprised to learn just how uncontroversial it was. Despite bogus headlines like CNN’s claiming Damore’s “manifesto” argued that women “aren’t suited for tech jobs,” it turns out that the engineer with a Ph.D. in systems biology from Harvard really was trying to help, or at least he thought he was.

Advertisement

It was no surprise, then, that Damore had to be destroyed in the media as quickly as possible to preserve the preferred media narrative. Gizmodo gave it a shot:

As it turns out, left-learning media outlets weren’t content to stop there and raced to see who could be first to discredit the “pseudoscience” of evolutionary psychology, which posits that men’s and women’s brains are different.

Yes, it was.

Don’t leave out Salon; they have their own take on the pseudoscience behind Damore’s memo.

Advertisement

What? Remember during her acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention when Hillary Clinton declared, “I believe in science”? Remember the March for Science in D.C.? How about the civil rights activist who argued that “you’re just wrong” if you’re not a scientist and disagree with a scientist about science?

https://twitter.com/JimmyMcCordJr/status/895409340613509120

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/Quotron_Inc/status/895413331388882944

https://twitter.com/gregb94/status/895415453417209857

https://twitter.com/ted7416/status/895429741720854531

It’s like claiming the science proving man-made climate change is settled because 97 percent of scientists say it is … which was a number derived from a study, not a survey.

Advertisement

Does Salon fare any better?

https://twitter.com/Moj_kobe/status/895343723969601536

* * *

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement