Unsound Barrier: Dem Shri Thanedar’s X Post Shows He Doesn’t Get the ‘Ins...
Jessica Tarlov Didn’t Know Biden Lied About ‘Secure Border’ Until Fox News Drone...
Tapped Out Tapper: CNN’s Latest Attempt to Lure in Viewers As Bad As...
Tiny Village to Be Dumping Ground for Asylum-Seekers Votes to Become Independent From...
Say It Isn’t Sole: NY X Account Posts Freakish Foot-Face Photo to Promote...
Bernie Sanders Says It’s Embarrassing How Little the President Knows About the Dangers...
'FactPost' Claims Pennsylvania Has Reported Four Measles Deaths This Year; Shapiro Piles o...
Jake Tapper Thinks CA’s COVID Response Is Being Used As a Cudgel on...
Boston Herald: Lindsay Clancy Holdout Juror Now Getting the Negative Attention He Deserves
NYPost Looks Into Anthropic CEO's Woke Handpicked AI Watchdog Group
'Shady As F**k': Pro-Talarico Super PAC Finds ‘Roundabout Way of Paying People for...
NYT Blames 'Editing Error' for Saying Israelis See Themselves As the Victims of...
Watching Kash Patel Infuriate Cory Booker (While Getting in a Dig at Schiff)...
Athletic Scholarships Are Scarce. A Well-Rounded Kid Shouldn’t Be the Sacrifice
Chalk Up Another Massive L for Newsom: TMZ Reports That Paramount Is Ditching...

New York Times determined to find political balance in shootings, even if means reviving old lie

Politics can get ugly, as if anyone in 2017 needed proof. If the media had any self-awareness, they might realize the reason people aren’t taking pity on them recently is they don’t seem to remember just how complicit they were in bringing things to a crisis point.

Advertisement

Looking back, the fuss over the rise of “violent rhetoric” in politics would seem almost quaint if journalists and political opponents hadn’t tried to tie Sarah Palin to the shooting of Gabby Giffords over some stupid graphics on an electoral map.

That whole mess was debunked, but in trying to cover all bases Wednesday night, the New York Times really, really needed some balance for its editorial on the Alexandria shooting. Vox’s Ezra Klein had done a test run earlier in the day and it seemed to fly with some, so why not?

https://twitter.com/AgeOfKEK/status/875184942216597504

The link to political incitement was clear? Are they seriously reviving that myth to “balance out” the piece?

Advertisement

It really is the very worst sort of response: just shrug and contend that “both sides are just as bad.”

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/rolf_wahrheit/status/875174198624309249

https://twitter.com/CounterMoonbat/status/875189247036272641

Glenn Greenwald had his own beef with the New York Times, which decided that those belligerent “Bernie Bros” were a sign of the rage “buried in some corners of the progressive left.”

Yes, the alleged shooter was a Bernie Sanders supporter, which compelled Bernie himself to disavow any connection during a speech on the Senate floor.

Advertisement

But tell us again about this rage that’s, um, “buried” among the progressive left? Because the giant fire set in the middle of the Berkeley campus vandalized by leftists was pretty darn visible. And the riots in Portland right after the election were pretty easy to spot, especially if a progressive leftist had smashed out your windshield. And if you missed the first Portland riots, you just had to wait a bit for another to come along.

And that doesn’t even count the fights and sucker punches and vandalism and riots outside of Trump’s campaign rallies in Albuquerque and San José.

Advertisement

Do better, New York Times. Dragging out old lies to provide political balance isn’t solving anything except your need to sound sincere to your readership right now.

Let’s see if the Washington Post is doing any better.

Nope.

* * *

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos