Kamala Harris Warns Voters Will Have to Prove Their Identity If GOP Gets...
Spencer Pratt Shares Video of the 'Perfect Poster Boy for Communism' Near Trump's...
Older Clip of Mamdani Has People Asking 'Was That Accent Fake or Is...
Congress Turns Up the Heat on Fauci While Blanche Passes Senate Test
Abdul El-Sayed Responds to End Wokeness and Doubles Down on 'I Hate Mackinac'
University Will Curb the Mental Health Crisis by Hiding First Semester Grades From...
What Could Possib-Lie Go Wrong? Nutjob Scientist Wants to Push the Earth Away...
Former DNC Vice Chair David Hogg Says There's No Room for Moderates in...
Democracy Dimwit: DSA Co-Chair Cannot Explain What ‘Taxing the Hell Out of Millionaires’...
Jemele Hill’s Dishonest Spin on Trans Athletes: The Fight for Girls’ Sports Is...
Bernie Coaches Baby Socialists: Keep the Real Agenda Quiet Until After You’ve Fooled...
Patients Who? Nurses Ditch the Sick to Stage a Walkout After ICE Grabs...
Mental Loop Lunacy: Hillary Clinton Still Hasn’t Gotten Over Her 2016 Presidential Debate...
Marriage on ICE: ‘Lifelong Republican’ Shocked to Learn Immigration Laws Apply to His...
Dr. Robert Malone Puts Fauci's Wife and the NIH on BLAST After She...

New York Times determined to find political balance in shootings, even if means reviving old lie

Politics can get ugly, as if anyone in 2017 needed proof. If the media had any self-awareness, they might realize the reason people aren’t taking pity on them recently is they don’t seem to remember just how complicit they were in bringing things to a crisis point.

Advertisement

Looking back, the fuss over the rise of “violent rhetoric” in politics would seem almost quaint if journalists and political opponents hadn’t tried to tie Sarah Palin to the shooting of Gabby Giffords over some stupid graphics on an electoral map.

That whole mess was debunked, but in trying to cover all bases Wednesday night, the New York Times really, really needed some balance for its editorial on the Alexandria shooting. Vox’s Ezra Klein had done a test run earlier in the day and it seemed to fly with some, so why not?

https://twitter.com/AgeOfKEK/status/875184942216597504

The link to political incitement was clear? Are they seriously reviving that myth to “balance out” the piece?

Advertisement

It really is the very worst sort of response: just shrug and contend that “both sides are just as bad.”

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/rolf_wahrheit/status/875174198624309249

https://twitter.com/CounterMoonbat/status/875189247036272641

Glenn Greenwald had his own beef with the New York Times, which decided that those belligerent “Bernie Bros” were a sign of the rage “buried in some corners of the progressive left.”

Yes, the alleged shooter was a Bernie Sanders supporter, which compelled Bernie himself to disavow any connection during a speech on the Senate floor.

Advertisement

But tell us again about this rage that’s, um, “buried” among the progressive left? Because the giant fire set in the middle of the Berkeley campus vandalized by leftists was pretty darn visible. And the riots in Portland right after the election were pretty easy to spot, especially if a progressive leftist had smashed out your windshield. And if you missed the first Portland riots, you just had to wait a bit for another to come along.

And that doesn’t even count the fights and sucker punches and vandalism and riots outside of Trump’s campaign rallies in Albuquerque and San José.

Advertisement

Do better, New York Times. Dragging out old lies to provide political balance isn’t solving anything except your need to sound sincere to your readership right now.

Let’s see if the Washington Post is doing any better.

Nope.

* * *

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement