NY Post Continues to Call Man Who Killed Parents 'She,' Even As HE...
You Know ... for the Kids: LEGO Releases 'Pride Parade' Video Featuring Drag...
Yes, We Know Who Donald Trump Is, Mr. President. We Now Also Know...
Guardian Gets in on the 'Cheap Fakes' That Are 'Low-Level Manipulation'
Rep. Rashida Tlaib, Nina Turner: Palestinian Liberation and Black Liberation Are Interconn...
London Breed Challenges Mayoral Candidate to Name Three Drag Queens
Clutch the Pearls: Sudden Alarmism Over 'Excessive Heat' Is the Environmentalist's Latest...
Shooting Breaks Out at Oakland Juneteenth Celebration; Mayor Raided by FBI
Sen. John Kennedy Shames Judicial Nominee for Finding 'a Lot of Good' in...
Words Mean Things: Wisconsin Supreme Court Gets VERY Creative With Definition of 'Sidewalk...
We Got a VIP White Woman in Here! DOJ Alum Julie Zebrak Launches...
Conservatives Are Imagining New Pride Flags to Be Outraged About
That's Not How This Works. Dem Strategist Keith Edwards Whines Over SCOTUS Power...
Son of Spengler Drops TRUTH BOMBS With Epic Thread on Understanding Biden Administration...
You're the REASON Life is Unaffordable! Extreme Hakeem Jeffries Says Dems Are HELPING...

New York Times determined to find political balance in shootings, even if means reviving old lie

Politics can get ugly, as if anyone in 2017 needed proof. If the media had any self-awareness, they might realize the reason people aren’t taking pity on them recently is they don’t seem to remember just how complicit they were in bringing things to a crisis point.


Looking back, the fuss over the rise of “violent rhetoric” in politics would seem almost quaint if journalists and political opponents hadn’t tried to tie Sarah Palin to the shooting of Gabby Giffords over some stupid graphics on an electoral map.

That whole mess was debunked, but in trying to cover all bases Wednesday night, the New York Times really, really needed some balance for its editorial on the Alexandria shooting. Vox’s Ezra Klein had done a test run earlier in the day and it seemed to fly with some, so why not?


The link to political incitement was clear? Are they seriously reviving that myth to “balance out” the piece?


It really is the very worst sort of response: just shrug and contend that “both sides are just as bad.”




Glenn Greenwald had his own beef with the New York Times, which decided that those belligerent “Bernie Bros” were a sign of the rage “buried in some corners of the progressive left.”

Yes, the alleged shooter was a Bernie Sanders supporter, which compelled Bernie himself to disavow any connection during a speech on the Senate floor.


But tell us again about this rage that’s, um, “buried” among the progressive left? Because the giant fire set in the middle of the Berkeley campus vandalized by leftists was pretty darn visible. And the riots in Portland right after the election were pretty easy to spot, especially if a progressive leftist had smashed out your windshield. And if you missed the first Portland riots, you just had to wait a bit for another to come along.

And that doesn’t even count the fights and sucker punches and vandalism and riots outside of Trump’s campaign rallies in Albuquerque and San José.


Do better, New York Times. Dragging out old lies to provide political balance isn’t solving anything except your need to sound sincere to your readership right now.

Let’s see if the Washington Post is doing any better.


* * *


Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Twitchy Videos