Bracing for Beto 2.0: MAGA Prepares for Legacy Media Fawning Over Boring Beta...
Woman at Illinois State Capitol Says in Prayer That Islam Is Woven Into...
ABC News: ICE Detainees Are Taking Their Own Lives at an 'Alarming' Rate
NY Assemblyman Introduces a 100 Percent Tax on Trump’s 'Illegal January 6 Slush...
WaPo Asks a Pool Guy If Trump Picked the Correct Color for the...
Jill Biden Now Claims She Feared a Stroke — But Only After Spending...
Brandon Johnson Says He Will Fight ‘Teen Takeovers’ by Holding Social Media Accountable
Tim Miller's Blasphemous Meltdown: 'The Bulwark' Doubles Down on Vulgar Anti-Christian Att...
DHS Secretary Drawing Up Plans to Block International Flights Into Sanctuary Cities
DNC Insults Trans Community in Vulgar Response to Stephen Miller Post About James...
Zaid Jilani Wants to Know Why Graham Platner’s ‘Accidental Tattoo’ Is Disqualifying
No, James Talarico: Galatians 3:28 Doesn’t Mean God is Nonbinary
ICE Agent Shover Rep. LaMonica McIver Says ICE Henchmen Are Shoving Her 'Neighbors'
'This Is Texas, THIS Is Not': Ken Paxton's First Ad About Low-T Talarico...
Jesse Watters Reading 'Disgusting' RNC Research on Graham Platner Didn't Sit Well With...

New York Times determined to find political balance in shootings, even if means reviving old lie

Politics can get ugly, as if anyone in 2017 needed proof. If the media had any self-awareness, they might realize the reason people aren’t taking pity on them recently is they don’t seem to remember just how complicit they were in bringing things to a crisis point.

Advertisement

Looking back, the fuss over the rise of “violent rhetoric” in politics would seem almost quaint if journalists and political opponents hadn’t tried to tie Sarah Palin to the shooting of Gabby Giffords over some stupid graphics on an electoral map.

That whole mess was debunked, but in trying to cover all bases Wednesday night, the New York Times really, really needed some balance for its editorial on the Alexandria shooting. Vox’s Ezra Klein had done a test run earlier in the day and it seemed to fly with some, so why not?

https://twitter.com/AgeOfKEK/status/875184942216597504

The link to political incitement was clear? Are they seriously reviving that myth to “balance out” the piece?

Advertisement

It really is the very worst sort of response: just shrug and contend that “both sides are just as bad.”

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/rolf_wahrheit/status/875174198624309249

https://twitter.com/CounterMoonbat/status/875189247036272641

Glenn Greenwald had his own beef with the New York Times, which decided that those belligerent “Bernie Bros” were a sign of the rage “buried in some corners of the progressive left.”

Yes, the alleged shooter was a Bernie Sanders supporter, which compelled Bernie himself to disavow any connection during a speech on the Senate floor.

Advertisement

But tell us again about this rage that’s, um, “buried” among the progressive left? Because the giant fire set in the middle of the Berkeley campus vandalized by leftists was pretty darn visible. And the riots in Portland right after the election were pretty easy to spot, especially if a progressive leftist had smashed out your windshield. And if you missed the first Portland riots, you just had to wait a bit for another to come along.

And that doesn’t even count the fights and sucker punches and vandalism and riots outside of Trump’s campaign rallies in Albuquerque and San José.

Advertisement

Do better, New York Times. Dragging out old lies to provide political balance isn’t solving anything except your need to sound sincere to your readership right now.

Let’s see if the Washington Post is doing any better.

Nope.

* * *

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement