Make It Make SENSE: Iranian Television Aired THIS Tucker Carlson Segment As Pro-Iranian...
The Black Robed Regiment How Pastors Led the Fight for American Independence
HOOBOY: Jessica Tarlov Learns the HARD WAY You Don't Mess With Texas Trying...
Joe Scarborough's SAVE America Act Fit Was Hard to Watch
WOW: Newly Released CIA Docs Show the Biden Administration Declared WAR on Motherhood...
So... Extradition? Republic of Somaliland Drops Some CRAZY-DAMNING Receipts About Ilhan Om...
Judging From This Cover The Economist Is Trying to Sell Subscriptions to the...
Ric Grenell Posts the PERFECT 2-Word DIG at Dems Throwing Hissy Fit and...
Dogged House Dems Had Another Chance to Prove How Much They Oppose Deportations...
Megyn Kelly Ditches the Last Shred of Sanity We Hoped She Had Left...
Here's a Shot/Chaser Starring Kathy Hochul Telling Certain New Yorkers to Get Out...
WOOF: Yale Prof Tim Snyder SCHOOLED on Basic Economics After He Claims 'Migrants...
Dem Sen. Warnock Makes an Accidental Pitch for the SAVE Act Before Claiming...
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy Has the Last Word About a Fresh Boondoggle in...
Joe Kent's Attempt to Use Charlie Kirk for Anti-Israel Argument DEBUNKED By Charlie...

Juan Williams dismayed that Twitter's 'distorted avalanche of public opinion' helping Romney

It’s no secret that many “real journalists” have a thorny relationship with those meddling “just a blogger” types and their social media tools. Juan Williams writes on FoxNews.com today that tools like Twitter have allowed “grandma, the kids and everyone else in the living room” for the first time to “score” presidential debates as they happen — and he’s not happy about it. Why? Because of “the power of social media to create a distorted avalanche of public opinion about what happened.”

Advertisement

So what really happened? In Williams’ opinion, it’s not so clear that President Obama lost the first presidential debate. However, a deluge of tweets bemoaning Obama’s barely there attitude — even from the president’s most loyal and liberal celebrity supporters — allowed those following along on their laptops to develop their own opinions before the fact-checkers of the dinosaur media even had a chance to start the spin cycle.

The perception that coalesced around that first debate turned the election from a likely Obama win to a dead heat. It was as if he had garbled his words, lost his thoughts and made factual errors – none of which occurred. But it nonetheless moved the polls in a big way.

The perception that Romney won the first debate was a byproduct of this new media experience. Even though Obama won the two subsequent debates, it was not enough to dislodge the initial perception and he could lose the election because of it. Welcome to the new political order.

So, Romney might win the election because millions on Twitter mistakenly thought Obama lost the first debate? OK!

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/Zeppolitics1978/status/261571055502651392

https://twitter.com/Rags2Rockets/status/261571390719803392

https://twitter.com/clearlyright/status/261574670011211776

If Williams is upset by the public’s thirst for “zingers” over substance and the popularity of hashtags like Big Bird, binders and bayonets, he might want to have a look at just which campaign rushed to embrace each one and incorporate it into its own tweets and TV spots to the point of absurdity. Or does he have #Romnesia?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos