From Usha Vance’s Marriage to Melania: Stepstool Abdul El-Sayed Can’t Leave Other Men’s...
Oompa Loompa-Sized Activist Calls America a Dictatorship — and Walks Off Unarrested
Michelle Obama Says She Doesn’t Miss Her Kids at Home. A Lot of...
Jeffries Accuses Trump and Republicans of ‘Jim Crow-Like Tactics’ and ‘Wickedness’
Jasmine Crockett Ain’t Standing by Any Man — Especially Not the One She...
Terrible Terrorist Tabloid: Rolling Stone Anoints Hasan Piker a Top 'Influencer' For 2026
Don Lemon Says He’s Like Malcolm X and Can ‘Tell the Truth’ Since...
Systemic Racism: Brandon Johnson Brags About Violating Civil Rights Law in His Administrat...
ICE Nabs Its Own Cheerleader: Milo Yiannopoulos Held in Louisiana Detention Facing Removal
Imagine That!: Dem Chris Murphy Lies About DHS Illegal Alien Crackdown in Connecticut
Democrats Invent a Trump Affair Scandal, but Gavin Newsom’s Aide Has Been Velcro’d...
Heap Big OUCH! Scott Bessent Offers Elizabeth Warren a Free Course on 'Foreign...
Joe Walsh Remains One of the Biggest Self-Serving, Annoying TOOLS on Social Media
HA HA HA —WATCH! Never-Trumper Norm Eisen Accidentally Makes Case Against ALL Mail-In...
Hillary Clinton-Inspired Immigration Shot and Chaser Proves She Has ZERO Actual Principles

Juan Williams dismayed that Twitter's 'distorted avalanche of public opinion' helping Romney

It’s no secret that many “real journalists” have a thorny relationship with those meddling “just a blogger” types and their social media tools. Juan Williams writes on FoxNews.com today that tools like Twitter have allowed “grandma, the kids and everyone else in the living room” for the first time to “score” presidential debates as they happen — and he’s not happy about it. Why? Because of “the power of social media to create a distorted avalanche of public opinion about what happened.”

Advertisement

So what really happened? In Williams’ opinion, it’s not so clear that President Obama lost the first presidential debate. However, a deluge of tweets bemoaning Obama’s barely there attitude — even from the president’s most loyal and liberal celebrity supporters — allowed those following along on their laptops to develop their own opinions before the fact-checkers of the dinosaur media even had a chance to start the spin cycle.

The perception that coalesced around that first debate turned the election from a likely Obama win to a dead heat. It was as if he had garbled his words, lost his thoughts and made factual errors – none of which occurred. But it nonetheless moved the polls in a big way.

The perception that Romney won the first debate was a byproduct of this new media experience. Even though Obama won the two subsequent debates, it was not enough to dislodge the initial perception and he could lose the election because of it. Welcome to the new political order.

So, Romney might win the election because millions on Twitter mistakenly thought Obama lost the first debate? OK!

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/Zeppolitics1978/status/261571055502651392

https://twitter.com/Rags2Rockets/status/261571390719803392

https://twitter.com/clearlyright/status/261574670011211776

If Williams is upset by the public’s thirst for “zingers” over substance and the popularity of hashtags like Big Bird, binders and bayonets, he might want to have a look at just which campaign rushed to embrace each one and incorporate it into its own tweets and TV spots to the point of absurdity. Or does he have #Romnesia?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement