SCOTUS Takes on Trump's Birthright Citizenship Crackdown: A Battle Over the 14th Amendment...
Netflix to Buy Warner Brothers. Will the Snyderverse Make a Return?
Joe Biden Emerges From Dems' Forced Retirement to Remind Us We Are the...
Rising to the Caucasian: Jake Tapper’s ‘White’ Lie Is Beyond the Pale but...
Harmeet Dhillon Exposes 260K Dead + Thousands of Illegals on Voter Rolls –...
It's ALL Non-Standard! Doctors Admit Performing Horrific 'Non-Standard' Gender Surgeries o...
The MN Welfare Fraud Scheme Just Got REALLY Uncomfortable for Tim Walz and...
Out of the Mouths of Babes: Teen Girls Torch Democrat Governor for Betraying...
If Anyone Is 'Garbage,' It Is Elected Democrats and Their Manufactured, Selective Outrage
President Trump’s Soccer Take Triggers National Emergency-Level Meltdown
'What Happened Should Worry Everyone': Adam Schiff Mortgage Fraud Case Witness Shares EYE-...
Elissa Slotkin's 'Seditious Six' Narrative Crumbles on 'Morning Joe'
'MASSIVE Fraud Uncovered' --> New Obamacare Data Shares DAMNING Look Into Shady Subsidy...
Chris Murphy Trips Over a Horde of Rabid Dems in Rush to Blame...
Ya' LOVE to See It: Turns Out Both Eric Swalwell and Katie Porter...

NBC News' fact-check of Ketanji Brown Jackson's 'twisted' record notes it's 'not a radical view' that some child-sex offenders may have nonsexual motivations

All eyes are on Sen. Josh Hawley during the confirmation hearings for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson and “we should all prepare for his funeral tomorrow.” Hawley made waves with a Twitter thread “cherry-picking” from Jackson’s record and speeches and suggesting she might be soft on sexual offenders where children are involved. Hawley’s sticking by his thread with a retweet of the Washington Examiner.

Advertisement

We’re not sure if this fact-check was done by NBC News and picked up by NBC Chicago or if NBC Chicago did it, but either way, Will Weissert and Calvin Woodward make it clear that Republicans are “twisting” Jackson’s record.

So? What about Hawley’s claim that Jackson has sentenced child sex offenders to sentences shorter than the suggested minimum guidelines? Our fact-checkers write:

She told the [sentencing] hearing she was surprised at a Justice Department expert’s testimony that, as she put it, some child-sex offenders may actually “not be pedophiles” but perhaps “loners” looking for like-minded company in child pornography circles. Being surprised by an assertion and wanting to know more are not the same as endorsing it.

From those questions, Hawley extrapolated that Jackson had drawn conclusions, when she hadn’t.

But several behavioral science researchers testified at that hearing that there may be nonsexual motivations among a portion of child-sex criminals. It is not a radical view. And many judges do see a distinction between those who produce child pornography and those who receive it.

It’s not a radical view among some researchers that pedophilia isn’t a crime but just another misunderstood sexual orientation. Salon was blasted last fall for “trying to mainstream pedophilia” in an article titled, “I’m a pedophile, but not a monster.” Just this January, USA Today wrote that “there’s a lot we’re misunderstanding” about pedophilia. Slate pondered if pedophilia was a crime to be punished. We note that the New York Times has deleted its repugnant headline about pedophilia. Into the memory hole it goes, along with Salon’s articles.

Advertisement

So yeah, maybe she was just asking questions. That still doesn’t explain the under-sentencing of sex offenders noted in Hawley’s thread. Is it really so wrong for senators to want to clarify a Supreme Court nominee’s thinking on the issue?

Advertisement

It really isn’t a fact-check at all. Take the specific cases Hawley cited, and then “fact-check” whether or not Jackson was lenient in her sentencing.


Related:

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement