Uh Oh: After Humiliating Congressional Hearing, U Penn President Magill May Be Asked...
White House Scrubs CAIR From Its Antisemitism Fact Sheet After Leader Praises October...
A Day That Will Live In Infamy: Remember Pearl Harbor 82 Years Later
Receipts: WaPo Lost It When Trump Used the Word 'Vermin,' But Check Out...
Rashida Tlaib's Shameless Objection to Rep. Bowman's House Censure Earns a BRUTAL Communit...
Austin Shooter Shane James Bailed Out By Progressive Group Last Year
Former HRW Director Says There Was Just a 'Modest' Presence of Hamas Under...
Planned Parenthood Getting Flak From the Left for Its Statement Denouncing Hamas
BREAKING: The Fed Plans To Charge 636 Month Old Child Hunter Biden with...
That's Gonna Sting: U Penn Loses $100 Million Donation After President Magill's Congressio...
Elizabeth Warren (Who Is Very Rich) Wants To Ban Crypto
At Harvard, Sizeism and Fatphobia Are Violence, but Not Calling for Genocide
There Are MANY Events: Nate Silver Laments Growing Distrust In Science, Can't Figure...
Sen. John Fetterman Surprises Us Again by Defending 'Reasonable' Border Talks
'We're Number One?': BBC Anchor Finds Creative New Way to Greet Her Viewers

'The gravest, most unforgivable sin': Twitter sounds off on SCOTUS leak

As Twitchy told you earlier, it appears the Supreme Court may have voted to end federal protection of abortion rights and return the decision to the states, where it belongs. Nothing is set in stone yet, but this story is a bombshell on more than one level.

Advertisement

 

It’s difficult to imagine having access to this kind of information and having the audacity to leak it. It’s even more difficult to imagine that there aren’t nefarious motives behind such an action.

The bigger story here could actually be the SCOTUS leak.

For the first time in a long time, we agree with Jonah Goldberg.

We’re as shocked as you are.

And of course, there are those who are cheering this on:

Advertisement

‘Hero.’

Okay, Ian.

The bottom line is the court will decide what it decides, and about half the country will agree while the other half won’t. This is the case with almost every decision it makes. Let’s not lose sight of the fact that the court can only do its job correctly when it is free from the external pressures of political jockeying.

And this most certainly feels like political jockeying.

Indeed.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement