Van Jones Unleashes Bizarre Rant on CNN Claiming the Democrats Won the Schumer...
Scott Jennings Leaves Son of Actor Michael Douglas Stuttering Over SNAP and the...
Getting Closer: Bill to End the Schumer Shutdown Officially Passes Senate, Heads to...
Economist: Pro-Natalism Is Part of an Insidious Plot to Create a Whiter America
Muslim Preacher Says Americans Are So Uncivilized and Backward That They Use Toilet...
UK Broadcaster Says BBC Faces a Politically Motivated Attack; Brian Stelter Calls It...
‘Just a Mom’ Begs for Mercy After Being Pulled Over for Interfering With...
Megyn Kelly: We Rejected the Nonsense That Trans Women’s Birth Certificates Were ‘Written...
Gavin Newsom Jetted Thousands of Miles to Blame Arson on Climate Change (Rainforest...
Harvard Hoards Billions but Threatens to Halt Breast Cancer Cure After Trump Admin...
Homeschooled Teen BAILS on Public School After 48 Hours of Chaos
Project Lincoln Guy Assumes Breast Cancer Doesn’t Affect Trump Voters Due to Funding...
Transportation Sec. Sean Duffy Tells Pete Buttigieg He Spends His Whole Day Cleaning...
Zohran Mamdani's All-Female Transition Team: Nepo Babies, TikTok Vibes, and a Slow-Motion...
Two US Attorneys Who Were to Prosecute the Russian 'Conspiracy Theory' Players Resign

Variety Mag Doubles Down, Says We Need MORE Celebrities Lecturing Us on Politics (Good Luck With That!)

Twitter

Kamala Harris spent a lot of money on celebrity endorsements, including a purported $1 million for her sit down with Oprah. She had Beyoncé attend a rally in Houston with the bait-and-switch promise of a show; some 30,000 Beyoncé fans attended and booed Kamala when Queen Bey didn't perform.

Advertisement

It didn't work.

Nothing is more tone deaf than a bunch of rich people who couldn't tell you the price of butter lecturing voters who are choosing between putting food on their tables or keeping the lights on.

It's part of why Kamala lost the popular vote. Rather than distance themselves from celebrity endorsements, however, Variety thinks we need more of it:

They write:

Did you know that Bruce Springsteen and Beyoncé lost the election for Kamala Harris? Or at least bear a large part of the responsibility for her party’s failure at the polls this year? It’s true, you know! — at least if you listen to some of the punditry coming from conservatives, and even from some Democratic operatives eager to find some celebs to push into the middle of their current circular firing squad. Listening to some of these voices, you’d think that Harris could have won six or seven swing states, if only Beyoncé hadn’t shown up to deliver one single four-minute rally speech, or if Taylor Swift hadn’t devoted a singular 300-word Instagram post to a Harris endorsement. Imagine the more favorable electoral counts if only some of the most beloved pop-culture figures in the world had kept their dirty traps shut, right?

You mad, bro? You sound mad.

No, they cannot.

Advertisement

Because they're rich and famous so they must know better than the rest of us.

They sure did.

All of this.

People who make more in one move than most of us will make in our lifetimes can take all the seats.

Bingo.

They will teach political science classes on this.

Advertisement

It's really good to know they're doing well in the Biden economy.

Not one person voted for Kamala Harris because of Taylor Swift.

Not one.

This is also rooted in the Left's insistence that everything be political. Every song, every football game, every movie, every episode of every TV show.

It does not all need to be political.

We won't stop them from making this mistake again.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement