Socialism 2026 Talks Transfeminist Absolutionism and Communist Sex Forests
Rep. Rashida Tlaib Says Antony Blinken ‘Totally Waited’ and Did Nothing to Stop...
DHS Announces That 19-Year-Old High School Serial Groper Has Been Deported
Yesterday’s Call, Tomorrow’s Anniversary
'A Gentle and Generous Soul': X Pays Tribute to Andrew Wimsatt
Bill Kristol: We Should Be Appalled Trump Is Trying to Impose the Anti-American...
Libs of TikTok Exposes Universities Celebrating the First ‘Kirkaversary’
Psaki Panics Over Fetterman Switch Talk — Maybe Democrats Should Have Behaved Better
Lindsay Clancy Juror Said It Was 'Disgusting' That Lone Holdout Re-Enacted Stranglings
Abdul El-Sayed Called American Prisons Racist and a Weapon. Michigan May Make Him...
Hillary Clinton Suggests Netanyahu Allowed October 7 to Happen So He Could ‘Come...
James Talarico Tells NBC News He ‘Missed the Mark’ When Speaking About Dismantling...
Janice Dean Self-Awareness Nukes Hillary Clinton and What Made Her Furious About the...
FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson WRECKS the Washington Post for Blatant Hit Job on...
Trump Ignites GOP Fire In Texas, Democrats About To Find Out

Variety Mag Doubles Down, Says We Need MORE Celebrities Lecturing Us on Politics (Good Luck With That!)

Twitter

Kamala Harris spent a lot of money on celebrity endorsements, including a purported $1 million for her sit down with Oprah. She had Beyoncé attend a rally in Houston with the bait-and-switch promise of a show; some 30,000 Beyoncé fans attended and booed Kamala when Queen Bey didn't perform.

Advertisement

It didn't work.

Nothing is more tone deaf than a bunch of rich people who couldn't tell you the price of butter lecturing voters who are choosing between putting food on their tables or keeping the lights on.

It's part of why Kamala lost the popular vote. Rather than distance themselves from celebrity endorsements, however, Variety thinks we need more of it:

They write:

Did you know that Bruce Springsteen and Beyoncé lost the election for Kamala Harris? Or at least bear a large part of the responsibility for her party’s failure at the polls this year? It’s true, you know! — at least if you listen to some of the punditry coming from conservatives, and even from some Democratic operatives eager to find some celebs to push into the middle of their current circular firing squad. Listening to some of these voices, you’d think that Harris could have won six or seven swing states, if only Beyoncé hadn’t shown up to deliver one single four-minute rally speech, or if Taylor Swift hadn’t devoted a singular 300-word Instagram post to a Harris endorsement. Imagine the more favorable electoral counts if only some of the most beloved pop-culture figures in the world had kept their dirty traps shut, right?

You mad, bro? You sound mad.

No, they cannot.

Advertisement

Because they're rich and famous so they must know better than the rest of us.

They sure did.

All of this.

People who make more in one move than most of us will make in our lifetimes can take all the seats.

Bingo.

They will teach political science classes on this.

Advertisement

It's really good to know they're doing well in the Biden economy.

Not one person voted for Kamala Harris because of Taylor Swift.

Not one.

This is also rooted in the Left's insistence that everything be political. Every song, every football game, every movie, every episode of every TV show.

It does not all need to be political.

We won't stop them from making this mistake again.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement