White House Panics as Trump Returns! Biden Thrilled!
Tiresome 'The View' Panel Spreads Misinformation on Pete Hegseth Without Correction
California Teacher Sparks Outrage After Telling Students Hispanic Trump Voting Parents Wan...
Sen. Chuck Schumer Warns Republicans Not to Abandon Bipartisanship When They Take Control
Senate Republicans Choose New Leader as They Prepare to Take Control and Advance...
Biden Seemed to Be Sending a Message During Friendly Oval Office Meeting With...
He's BACK! CNN's Jim Acosta Did His 'Journalism' Thing About Trump's Pick for...
Jill Biden Snubs Kamala: White House Cat-Fight After Humiliating Defeat
Politico Wants Us to Know Defense Industry Lobbyists Aren't Happy About Trump's SecDef...
Elizabeth Warren Goes on the Warpath Against Trump's Nomination of Pete Hegseth for...
So Long, Farewell, Auf Wiedersehen, Goodbye! The Guardian Will No Longer Post on...
'Bernstein's Face Is Priceless'! Scott Jennings Torches CNN Panel With Pete Hegseth Realit...
What Would You Say You 'DOGE' Here? Twitter Rejoices at Elon-Vivek Government Efficiency...
Sphere of Fear: Grifters Panic As Trump & Musk Promise to Derail Government...
Joe Walsh Rending Garments Over Pete Hegseth Made X Fun Again

Variety Mag Doubles Down, Says We Need MORE Celebrities Lecturing Us on Politics (Good Luck With That!)

Twitter

Kamala Harris spent a lot of money on celebrity endorsements, including a purported $1 million for her sit down with Oprah. She had Beyoncé attend a rally in Houston with the bait-and-switch promise of a show; some 30,000 Beyoncé fans attended and booed Kamala when Queen Bey didn't perform.

Advertisement

It didn't work.

Nothing is more tone deaf than a bunch of rich people who couldn't tell you the price of butter lecturing voters who are choosing between putting food on their tables or keeping the lights on.

It's part of why Kamala lost the popular vote. Rather than distance themselves from celebrity endorsements, however, Variety thinks we need more of it:

They write:

Did you know that Bruce Springsteen and Beyoncé lost the election for Kamala Harris? Or at least bear a large part of the responsibility for her party’s failure at the polls this year? It’s true, you know! — at least if you listen to some of the punditry coming from conservatives, and even from some Democratic operatives eager to find some celebs to push into the middle of their current circular firing squad. Listening to some of these voices, you’d think that Harris could have won six or seven swing states, if only Beyoncé hadn’t shown up to deliver one single four-minute rally speech, or if Taylor Swift hadn’t devoted a singular 300-word Instagram post to a Harris endorsement. Imagine the more favorable electoral counts if only some of the most beloved pop-culture figures in the world had kept their dirty traps shut, right?

You mad, bro? You sound mad.

No, they cannot.

Advertisement

Because they're rich and famous so they must know better than the rest of us.

They sure did.

All of this.

People who make more in one move than most of us will make in our lifetimes can take all the seats.

Bingo.

They will teach political science classes on this.

Advertisement

It's really good to know they're doing well in the Biden economy.

Not one person voted for Kamala Harris because of Taylor Swift.

Not one.

This is also rooted in the Left's insistence that everything be political. Every song, every football game, every movie, every episode of every TV show.

It does not all need to be political.

We won't stop them from making this mistake again.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement