Slammer Yammer: Video Surfaces of Talarico Calling for Prisons to Be Replaced With...
Tom Morello Reposts Journo Giving Three Year Letterman an Education
Law Prof Calls Karoline Leavitt 'Spitting Out President Obama's Middle Name' Despicable
We Learn More About Wife of Service Member Who Trashed Operation Epic Fury...
Legendary College Football Coach Lou Holtz has Died
Source: Trump Insisted on Name Operation Epic Fury to Keep Google From Autosuggesting...
Texas Picks Radical James Talarico: God Is Non-Binary, Men Get Pregnant, Jesus Loves...
Rep. Jasmine Crockett’s Replacement in Congress Could Be Even Worse Than She Was
Lights, Camera, HILLARY! Clinton Team Demanded ‘Beauty Lighting’ and Backdrop for Epstein...
Congresswoman Threatens Kristi Noem That She Will Be Held Accountable Once Trump Is...
Too Many Jasmine Crocketts! Will the Real Dem Lady Please Stand Up, Please...
RFK Jr. Raises Alarm Over Weed Killer Residue in Food as Billions Paid...
Tim Walz Allegedly NUKED 'MAGA Witch Hunt' by Declaring There Are No Somalis...
Confident CNN Reporter Gets Community Noted After Trying to School Sen. Fetterman on...
Watch: 'A Sitting US Senator Just Broke the Hand of a Marine,' Antiwar...

Elon Musk: Those Who Oppose SAVE Act Are Traitors (Will Saying What Happens to Traitors Earn a Ban on X?)

Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson laid out a plan for the SAVE Act, a set of federal election regulations meant to ensure only American citizens vote.

It's sure to face a challenge in the House, and probably won't make it through the Senate, but X owner Elon Musk had his own thoughts on it:

Advertisement

Ouch.

Probably not.

It's a fair point.

He's certainly made things much more interesting.

Watch the outcry from the Democratic Party on this.

Then ask yourself why.

Yes, we should.

Drop boxes, for example, shouldn't be allowed.

It shouldn't be.

We love the Elmo gif.

Advertisement

And given how inconsistently X enforces its own rules, it'll probably get you a suspension here, too.

Probably will be.

There could be Constitutional grounds about feds imposing rules on state elections, and that could be grounds for reasonable opposition, but securing elections should be a priority.

So spicy.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement