Platner Sent His Hurting Wife Out to Take the Heat — Been There,...
Twist and Tur: MS NOW 'Journo' Claims Dem James Talarico Took Back ‘God...
Cop Copulating Judge Reprimanded for Cheating in Chambers on the Taxpayer's Dime
Pray for Krystal Ball: Her Husband, Kyle Kulinski, Says ALL Republicans = Pedophiles,...
Erick Erickson on Platner: They Will Run From Him
Ro Khanna Pivots From LA Mayoral Race and Democrat Incumbents to Trump and...
Turley: Rep. Wasserman Schultz Yesterday's News in Democrat Land
Sexting Scandal Just Got Worse: Platner Team Threatened Former Staffer Then Tried to...
Larry Elder Nails Analogous Response to Fox News Headline Screengrab
'WOKE OVERLOAD': Rashida Tlaib Says Women Having Periods Equals Economic Violence and I...
Black Democrat SHREDS Jon Favreau for Defending Platner 'Cuz 'He's a White Man'...
His FACE! LOL! WATCH Democrat Andy Kim Duck, Dodge, and DIVE During CNN...
Dems Are Twisting Themselves Into DESPERATE Pretzels Defending Platner, HERE Are Some of...
What I Read About Platner's Wife AFTER She Defended Her Scumbag Husband Makes...
Just INSANELY Creepy: GUESS Which Democrat Thought Posting His Texts With a 13-YEAR-OLD...

Elon Musk: Those Who Oppose SAVE Act Are Traitors (Will Saying What Happens to Traitors Earn a Ban on X?)

Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson laid out a plan for the SAVE Act, a set of federal election regulations meant to ensure only American citizens vote.

It's sure to face a challenge in the House, and probably won't make it through the Senate, but X owner Elon Musk had his own thoughts on it:

Advertisement

Ouch.

Probably not.

It's a fair point.

He's certainly made things much more interesting.

Watch the outcry from the Democratic Party on this.

Then ask yourself why.

Yes, we should.

Drop boxes, for example, shouldn't be allowed.

It shouldn't be.

We love the Elmo gif.

Advertisement

And given how inconsistently X enforces its own rules, it'll probably get you a suspension here, too.

Probably will be.

There could be Constitutional grounds about feds imposing rules on state elections, and that could be grounds for reasonable opposition, but securing elections should be a priority.

So spicy.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement