NYC Councilwoman Who Smeared Daniel Penny SHAMES Men for Not Calling Out Violence...
Here's a Poll Listing Biden's Positive Accomplishments and We CAN'T Disagree With the...
WATCH: As Boston Ponders Reparations, Black Churches Tell White Churches They're 'Coming f...
WI Dem State Senator and Well-Known Shoplifter Claims Nobody 'Deserves' to Be a...
CNN Host’s Segment on the Abortion Pill Doesn't Go Quite As Planned
Hilarious Community Note on Brigitte Gabriel Post Also Shows the Absolute State of...
And YOU'RE Paying! Thread Shows FREEBIES Biden Is Giving Illegals and It's SO...
HA! Megyn Kelly Rubs Salt in Sunny Hostin's WOUND After Coleman Hughes Chewed...
Karine Jean-Pierre Did NOT Want the Press Recording Obama's Media Pep Rally Aboard...
How Do States Further Residents’ 2A Rights Once Constitutional Carry Is Passed?
Horde of Anti-Israel Mouth-Breathing Douchenozzels Disrupts Holocaust Remembrance Day Meet...
Time Again to Play 'NBC News Story or Biden White House Press Release?'
Take the L! Jon Stewart's Attempt at Damage Control After Being Caught Doing...
She SO MAD! LOL! Jim Jordan Dares to Hold Fani Wilis ACCOUNTABLE and...
By DESIGN: Sen. John Kennedy Is Straight-FIRE Going OFF on Biden and Dems...

Did Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez just violate the First Amendment?

So recently the Alexandria Occasional-Cortex Ocasio-Cortez parody press account that is repeatedly marked as parody was let out of so-called ‘permanent suspension’ (seriously, never believe Twitter when they say a suspension is permanent). That brought a lot of attention to the account, as did when this exchange happened:

Advertisement

So, this prompted this reaction from Ms. Ocasio-Cortez (the real one, not the intentionally funny one):

And there was lots of mockery, as we reported here and here. Next thing we know, we see this:

If that’s genuine, then Ms. Ocasio-Cortez seems to have knowingly violated the First Amendment.

But, let’s use some caution, here. After all, this is a tweet from a parody account. By the very nature of the beast, you can’t 100% trust what it is saying—it might be their idea of a joke.

But let’s pretend it is true (our “gut” says it is, fwiw). New York is covered by the Second Circuit and the Second Circuit told President Trump in no uncertain terms that blocking people on Twitter violated the First Amendment in Knight First Amendment Inst. Columbia v. Trump, 928 F. 3d 226 (2d Cir. 2019). The Knight court (heh) described those plaintiffs’ winning complaint as follows:

Advertisement

In May and June of 2017, the President blocked each of the Individual Plaintiffs (but not the Knight First Amendment Institute) from the Account. The government concedes that each of them was blocked after posting replies in which they criticized the President or his policies and that they were blocked as a result of their criticism. The government also concedes that because they were blocked they are unable to view the President’s tweets, to directly reply to these tweets, or to use the @realDonaldTrump webpage to view the comment threads associated with the President’s tweets.

The Individual Plaintiffs further contend that their inability to view, retweet, and reply to the President’s tweets limits their ability to participate with other members of the public in the comment threads that appear below the President’s tweets. The parties agree that, without the context of the President’s original tweets (which the Individual Plaintiffs are unable to view when logged in to their accounts), it is more difficult to follow the conversations occurring in the comment threads. In addition, the parties have stipulated that as a consequence of their having been blocked, the Individual Plaintiffs are burdened in their ability to view or directly reply to the President’s tweets, and to participate in the comment threads associated with the President’s tweets.

This burden, the Second Circuit found, violated the First Amendment.

Advertisement

Now, we think that decision is ridiculous. The President is not obligated to communicate with everyone every time he or she communicates, or to create a forum in which they can communicate with each other. For instance, if the President sends out a letter, he is not obligated to mail every American, or list the addresses of every American in the letter to facilitate discussion of the contents of that letter. And if the President sends an email, the same is true: He (or she) is not obligated to email every citizen, and to do so in a way that lets every American communicate with every other American by hitting ‘reply all.’

On the other hand, there is the concept of ‘their rules,’ the idea that even if we object to a certain rule, it should be applied to the left, good and hard. We are waiting for politicians to be told that they use can’t social media that engages in viewpoint discrimination (which violates the First Amendment).

But let’s keep the focus on Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. She’s already gotten a dose of ‘their rules’ when she blocked New York state assemblyman Dov Hikind on Twitter (whose name sounds suspiciously like ‘Dovahkiin’ to this fan of Skyrim). Mr. Hikind sued her, which resulted in this:

Advertisement

That’s right she admitted to violating the Dragonborn’s Mr. Hikind’s First Amendment rights. From the article:

‘Mr. Hikind has a First Amendment right to express his views and should not be blocked for them,’ she said in a statement. ‘In retrospect, it was wrong and improper and does not reflect the values I cherish. I sincerely apologize for blocking Mr. Hikind.’

So, if Ms. Ocasio-Cortez really blocked the parody account—and that’s a big ‘if’ given our source of information is a parody account—then it would seem she has stopped cherishing those values.

The only defense is to say that this is a personal account and she doesn’t do official business on it … which seems kind of dubious when she tweets out stuff like this:

Advertisement

In any case, there was much mockery:

That prompted this response:

*laughing*

Eh, we don’t think a person making fun of you is that much of a compliment, but you do you.

Advertisement

Fun and, we suspect, short.

Will they rename the Streisand Effect the ‘Ocasio-Cortez Effect?’

Of course, the congresscritter had some support:

The term ‘bully’ is one of the most misused terms in modern English.

Look, everyone, she is not going to date you.

Finally, one person made an observation:

Advertisement

We think he had a typo. He wrote ‘interesting’ when the correct word is ‘hilarious.’

***

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy’s conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement