Donald Trump at Border Confirms He Spoke to Laken Riley's Parents
Good Luck With That! Former MSNBC Host Mehdi Hasan Is Starting His Own...
Big Shift: White House Calls for Sanctuary Cities to Cooperate With ICE
FBI Director Christopher Wray Says US Is Bracing for Complex Threats to Elections...
Letitia James Inserts Herself Into Masterpiece Cake Shop Case
Lefty Journalist Lets the Cat Out of the Bag, Says What He REALLY...
NBC News: Crime Is Actually Dropping in Cities That Have Received the Most...
And ... Here ... We ... Go: Ron DeSantis Signs Law to Release...
Hot Take: Laken Riley's Murder Isn't About Illegal Immigration, But Male Violence
Vice President Kamala Harris Says They're Trying to Do to DEI What They...
MSNBC Legal Analyst Demands That SCOTUS Be Stopped
Viral Mardi Gras Dancing Video Divides Conservative Twitter in a Truly Odd Debate
Whoopi Goldberg Fantasizes About President Biden Jailing All Republicans
Are You This Stupid? SCOTUS Justices Claim Guns With Bump Stocks Can Fire...
Biden and His Cheat Sheet are Personally Patrolling the Border (the BP Union...

Anti-GMO tweeters protest so-called 'Monsanto Protection Act'

Opponents of genetically-modified food narrowly lost at the polls in California last month.

But the anti-GMO forces aren’t giving up. Their latest target: a provision in a House bill that would make it harder for environmentalists and their lawyers to prevent farmers from planting genetically-modified crops. Opponents of the provision are calling it the “Monsanto Protection Act” because Monsanto is a large manufacturer of genetically-modified seeds.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/EthanBearman/status/278926529990377472

The anti-GMO forces make it sound as if this provision would give farmers and seed-makers total immunity from federal law. According to AGProfessional, however, this claim is false. The provision in the House bill would simply allow farmers to grow federally-approved genetically-modified crops while legal appeals are ongoing:

The claim is that farmers are planting unapproved seed whereas in reality the farmer protection provision is geared toward allowing farmers to proceed in planting, or at least harvesting biotech crops, after an initial registration/approval. Farmers are not planting crops that were unapproved/unregistered by the USDA.

The situation has developed that every biotech/GMO crop approval is challenged by activists, which could delay farmer planting for years as court challenges stretch on and on. As noted by lawyers who have been involved in court cases, biotech crops have not been found to be unsafe. Setbacks in court to biotech crops have occurred as the registration paperwork was found to not be completed to micro detail.

Advertisement

Related: Charlie Sheen smears GMOs: ‘Why are the bees vanishing?’

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement