Kristi Noem Made Dem Sen. Chris Coons' Line of ICE Questioning Backfire With...
Jasmine Crockett Loses Dem Senate Primary to Hoax-Boosted James Talarico - Blames Republic...
Patch Dispatched: Seth Toth Scores Double-Digit Republican Primary Upset Over Incumbent Da...
National Post: Don’t Deport Truck Driver Who Killed 16 Canadian Teens
Man Who Had Security Clearance Revoked for Leaking Documents to Iran Has Thoughts...
Trump Cuts Off Trade With Spain After It Refuses to Let US Use...
For All of Us Who've Learned It the Hard Way: Grief's Quiet Lesson
'Always Money for War' Whines Senator Who Can’t Read a Budget—or a Bible
ICE Watch Activist Strolls Into Kristi Noem’s Senate Hearing Carrying Massive Backpack
LIVE ELECTION RESULTS: Primary Night in Texas and North Carolina!
CA State Sen. Scott Wiener Says Children Will Die If Teachers Must Out...
The Atlantic Wonders If a Bearded Pete Buttigieg Can Convince America He’s a...
DHS Says It Won't Comply With Denver's New Ban on Law Enforcement Agents...
Kurt Schlichter BODYING Conservative Wannabe Whining About Trump's Iran Strikes Is a BEAUT...
Operation Epic Fury Reminds MS NOW’s Chris Hayes of 9/11

Online Safety Bill poised to become UK law - Is this the end of free speech?

(AP Photo/Charles Krupa, File)

The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. While this writer can appreciate the intent of the Online Safety Bill in the UK, we feel like it likely crosses the line. 

Advertisement

So, we guess that we can kiss freedom of speech goodbye ... in the United Kingdom, anyway. More to the point, who is the arbiter of what content is 'harmful?'

This bill does have some good points. It is an evil wind that blows no good, after all. We are pleased that access to adult sites will have to be better controlled. There is something to be said for stronger age verification, although this writer knows several people who bypass security measures for a living, so there is that. Where we see the biggest problem is in the requirement to scan encrypted messages for 'harmful content,' and remove it as soon as feasible or prevent it from being posted if possible. Yes, you read that right, dear reader. The UK government wants social media companies to scan encrypted private messages under the guise of 'protecting the children.'

X users, as usual, did not mince words expressing their opinions, both in favor and opposed.

The law of unintended consequences, unfortunately, is the one law that Congress (or Parliament, in this case) can not repeal.

Advertisement

It is generally a good idea to perk one's ears up when one hears that it's 'for the children.'

A number of users referenced the mid-80's.  Gee, this author wonders what's so important about 1984 specifically.

Of serious concern is that social media companies who, up until now, have protected the privacy of their users, will be forced to create a backdoor for the government, a la Liberty Safe. 

In case you didn't immediately see it, that was pure, unadulterated, English Sarcasm. (Some of his respondents didn't catch on, but that's a different thread)

We did say some were in favor of this, didn't we?

Some even bragged about being the author of their own demise.

Simply put:

Advertisement

At least it's staying across the pond, right? RIGHT?!

Well, there goes the neighborhood. But at least it's 'for the children.'

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement