X Marks the Ad Spot! Big Win for Elon Musk and Free Speech...
'Move the F**K On': Justine Bateman Goes OFF on Scolds Lecturing Her About...
Censorship Loving 'Journalist' Jen Psaki Says We Need LAWS to Stop People Getting...
Hochul's Highway Heist: NY Governor's 'New Math' Is a Total Toll Trick
Democrats Form Shadow Government to Stop Trump!
AOC Explaining What Trump Supporters Think to Joy Reid is LITERALLY the Dumb...
ALL the Shade! Straight-FIRE Post Looks Back at Just How UNQUALIFIED Biden's Nominees...
Here Are Reminders About What People Calling RFK Jr. a Conspiracy Theorist Considered...
How Donald Trump Destroyed 'The View,' CNN, and MSNBC
Just WOW: What Chris Hayes' Guest Called Pete Hegseth Has People DEMANDING He...
YES! Jake Tapper Accidentally Gives Trump's Picks an EPIC New Nickname While Clutching...
Lying liar Whoopi Tries to Slander a Hometown Bakery, but Her Story Is...
FAFO! --> CT Teacher Bawls on the Air After Being FIRED for Threatening...
CNN: Plenty of Crying and Hugging in Justice Dept. Hallways After Trump's Gaetz...
Chip Roy OWNS Elizabeth Warren for Shrieking About RFK Jr. with ACTUAL Gov...

Online Safety Bill poised to become UK law - Is this the end of free speech?

(AP Photo/Charles Krupa, File)

The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. While this writer can appreciate the intent of the Online Safety Bill in the UK, we feel like it likely crosses the line. 

Advertisement

So, we guess that we can kiss freedom of speech goodbye ... in the United Kingdom, anyway. More to the point, who is the arbiter of what content is 'harmful?'

This bill does have some good points. It is an evil wind that blows no good, after all. We are pleased that access to adult sites will have to be better controlled. There is something to be said for stronger age verification, although this writer knows several people who bypass security measures for a living, so there is that. Where we see the biggest problem is in the requirement to scan encrypted messages for 'harmful content,' and remove it as soon as feasible or prevent it from being posted if possible. Yes, you read that right, dear reader. The UK government wants social media companies to scan encrypted private messages under the guise of 'protecting the children.'

X users, as usual, did not mince words expressing their opinions, both in favor and opposed.

The law of unintended consequences, unfortunately, is the one law that Congress (or Parliament, in this case) can not repeal.

Advertisement

It is generally a good idea to perk one's ears up when one hears that it's 'for the children.'

A number of users referenced the mid-80's.  Gee, this author wonders what's so important about 1984 specifically.

Of serious concern is that social media companies who, up until now, have protected the privacy of their users, will be forced to create a backdoor for the government, a la Liberty Safe. 

In case you didn't immediately see it, that was pure, unadulterated, English Sarcasm. (Some of his respondents didn't catch on, but that's a different thread)

We did say some were in favor of this, didn't we?

Some even bragged about being the author of their own demise.

Simply put:

Advertisement

At least it's staying across the pond, right? RIGHT?!

Well, there goes the neighborhood. But at least it's 'for the children.'

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement