Settle DOWN, Tiny: Abdul El-Sayed Challenging Mike Rogers to a Football Game Goes...
Let's Check in With How Decades of Climate Change Doom and Gloom Have...
Heap-Big OUCH! Peggy Flanagan Throws Elizabeth Warren Under the TEEPEE in Fundraising Emai...
It’s the Michigan Cray: Defeated Dem Haley Stevens Goes Wild Over PAC Money...
Even More BIZARRE: Tucker Carlson Goes on Paranoid, INSANE Rant About Israel 'Creating'...
Taxpayers Weigh in After Kathy Hochul Brags About How Much NY Is Spending...
Gets WORSE: Techno Fog Shares Most DAMNING Receipts yet of Former SPLC CFO's...
Under a Big ‘W?’: It’s a Mad World As WNBA Meeting Ends With...
Ilhan Omar Has INSISTED She's NOT Under Investigation BUT This Post Kinda Sorta...
MAGA Conspiracy! Jim Acosta Explains Why His Swipe at Karoline Leavitt Isn't Really...
What Gives?! Francesca Hong Was ON TRACK to Win ... So What Really...
WHOA: New BOMBSHELL Shows Maine Dem Troy Jackson Is Just As Bad (if...
WSJ Pours Cold Water on TDS Crowd's 'OMG Trump Used Reporters As Decoys'...
CNN SHREDDED for Leaving This Key Point OUT of Horrific Story About Black...
Chris Cuomo Praises ‘Rebranded’ AOC for Keeping Her Principles While Changing Political Po...

Online Safety Bill poised to become UK law - Is this the end of free speech?

(AP Photo/Charles Krupa, File)

The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. While this writer can appreciate the intent of the Online Safety Bill in the UK, we feel like it likely crosses the line. 

Advertisement

So, we guess that we can kiss freedom of speech goodbye ... in the United Kingdom, anyway. More to the point, who is the arbiter of what content is 'harmful?'

This bill does have some good points. It is an evil wind that blows no good, after all. We are pleased that access to adult sites will have to be better controlled. There is something to be said for stronger age verification, although this writer knows several people who bypass security measures for a living, so there is that. Where we see the biggest problem is in the requirement to scan encrypted messages for 'harmful content,' and remove it as soon as feasible or prevent it from being posted if possible. Yes, you read that right, dear reader. The UK government wants social media companies to scan encrypted private messages under the guise of 'protecting the children.'

X users, as usual, did not mince words expressing their opinions, both in favor and opposed.

The law of unintended consequences, unfortunately, is the one law that Congress (or Parliament, in this case) can not repeal.

Advertisement

It is generally a good idea to perk one's ears up when one hears that it's 'for the children.'

A number of users referenced the mid-80's.  Gee, this author wonders what's so important about 1984 specifically.

Of serious concern is that social media companies who, up until now, have protected the privacy of their users, will be forced to create a backdoor for the government, a la Liberty Safe. 

In case you didn't immediately see it, that was pure, unadulterated, English Sarcasm. (Some of his respondents didn't catch on, but that's a different thread)

We did say some were in favor of this, didn't we?

Some even bragged about being the author of their own demise.

Simply put:

Advertisement

At least it's staying across the pond, right? RIGHT?!

Well, there goes the neighborhood. But at least it's 'for the children.'

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement