Will Stancil REKT for Screeching CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS Because Trump Won't Roll Over for...
Election Interference! DAMNING Thread Legally Takes Jack Smith's DC Case Against Trump APA...
Gov. Roy Cooper TROUNCED for SLOBBERING All Over Biden Who FINALLY Showed Up...
TKO! James Woods DROPS Doug Emhoff for Hitting Women with Perfectly BRUTAL Post...
Narrative COLLAPSE! WATCH MSNBC Ari Melber Melt DOWN As Anti-Trump Impeachment Witness Vow...
Umm ... Who Wants to Tell Him? Biden Calls People Who Question Climate...
BIASED AI: You'll Be (Not) Shocked to Learn Microsoft's AI Image Generator Is...
Lawfare Costs Lives: Left's Hatred of Elon Musk Harmed North Carolinians After Hurricane...
INDUCT HIM NOW: Fans Ratio MLB 'In Memoriam' Post for Barring Pete Rose...
Jon Cryer Tries to Disparage Vance With 'Pretty in Pink' Reference and Shows...
Kamala Harris Comforts Storm Ravaged Georgians With Reminder FEMA Might Give Them $750
PATHETIC: The Bulwark Tries (and FAILS) to Dunk on Trump Attending Fundraiser After...
As Former President Jimmy Carter Turns 100, People Express Shock Over a Published...
OOPSIE DAISY! Biden (Who Rescinded Iran Sanctions Because He Hated Trump) Realizes He...
I Am Woman, Hear Me WHINE: 'Gender Bias Expert' CRIES About J.D. Vance...

NYT's Sheryl Gay Stolberg thinks RFK Jr. censorship hearing 'raised thorny questions about free speech'

Sarah D.

It's really important to be clear about something: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is not a guy we should be elevating. He's been a nutjob for decades, and just because he's expressed skepticism about the COVID vaccine doesn't negate all the damage he's done as a full-fledged anti-vaxxer.

Advertisement

Now, that being said, yesterday's House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government hearing on censorship, during which RFK Jr. testified, did help to illustrate an important point that he was trying to make: Democrats have disturbingly embraced a very pro-censorship mentality.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day. And with regard to censorship, RFK Jr.'s issues are valid. Disagreement with someone's point of view is not grounds to silence them, at least according to the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

And yet, New York Times Washington correspondent Sheryl Gay Stolberg, a member of the press, whose freedom is guaranteed in that same First Amendment, seems to think that freedom of speech is a "thorny" issue:

Advertisement

Stolberg writes:

Thursday’s session had all the makings of a Washington spectacle. A long line had formed outside the hearing room in the Rayburn House Office Building by the time Mr. Kennedy arrived. Kennedy supporters stood outside the building holding a Kennedy 2024 banner.

Despite the theater, the hearing raised thorny questions about free speech in a democratic society: Is misinformation protected by the First Amendment? When is it appropriate for the federal government to seek to tamp down the spread of falsehoods?

Democrats accused Republicans of giving Mr. Kennedy a forum for bigotry and pseudoscience. “Free speech is not an absolute,” said Delegate Stacey Plaskett of the Virgin Islands, the top Democrat on the subcommittee. “The Supreme Court has stated that. And others’ free speech that is allowed — hateful, abusive rhetoric — does not need to be promoted in the halls of the People’s House.”

Why does the First Amendment raise "thorny questions"?

There's nothing "thorny" about Stolberg's questions. 

She shouldn't even find it necessary to ask those questions. The First Amendment is pretty clear on free speech, and, as we've seen from both the media and our government, "misinformation" is a highly subjective term that is often used as a catch-all term for "any information we don't like or agree with or want out there in the world." And the idea that the government has an obligation "to tamp down the spread of falsehoods" when the government is frequently the source of falsehoods is ludicrous.

Advertisement

Maybe if Democrats ever get the chance to pack the Supreme Court, there will be. But as of yet, the answer is no. And that's as it should be.

The Ministry of Truth didn't quite work out, but we're sure that PolitiFact would be more than happy to offer up their "analysis" skills.

Advertisement

***

Related:

Dems try to silence RFK Jr. at gov't censorship hearing as irony detectors explode

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.  Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement