TIME Lists Some of the Ways the Operation Epic Fury Money Could Have...
Cesar Chavez Too 'Problematic' Even for the Left? UFW Ditches Founder Amid Sexual...
Proposed Rule Could Ban Trump From Major International Events, Including the Olympics
Warner Goes From Calling Kent Dangerous to High-Fiving His Resignation – TDS Strikes...
Hearing a 27-Year-Old Mom Say She Feels Nothing for Her Baby Broke Me—Because...
Cato Director: Immigrants Reduce Crime Rates, So You’re Less Likely to Be a...
Talarico Goes Full Vegan: Because Nothing Screams 'Elect Me' Like Banning Brisket in...
California’s First Partner Says Don’t Listen to Bullies Like President Trump
Fairfax Schools Releases Worthless Statement Regarding Illegal Who Groped a Dozen Girls
Governor Newsom's Press Office Gets Ratioed INTO THE SUN by Nick Shirley (and...
Ireland’s New President Says ‘Patrick’ Reminds Us of the Courage and Resilience of...
NYT's Kristof Laments Iranian Butcher as 'Pragmatic Peace Partner' After Israel Takes Him...
Bodycam Video Released of Jasmine Crockett’s Bodyguard Pulling a Gun on Police
From Rolling Stone to NYT: Editor Accused of Shielding Friend in Child Porn...
Sorry, Not Sorry, Haters But We Are Kicking Arse and Taking Names in...

If we didn't know any better, we might think Shannon Watts was disappointed more people weren't murdered in Greenwood mall shooting

Earlier, we told you about Brady Campaign President Kris Brown’s ridiculous and deranged take on the lawful concealed carrier who took down a man who opened fire on shoppers at the Greenwood Park Mall in Greenwood, Indiana, yesterday. Thanks to that “Good Samaritan’s” swift action, lives were saved.

Advertisement

Gun control advocates have been weirdly angry that the gunman didn’t succeed in killing more than three innocent people. It’s like they’re looking for a reason to make the hero out to be the bad guy in the scenario.

Well, needless to say, Moms Demand founder and ghoulish gun-grabber Shannon Watts is very, very disappointed in the man who stopped a mass shooting from being far deadlier, and according to her, his heroism is just further evidence that the Second Amendment isn’t all it’s cracked up to be:

Advertisement

It almost sounds like Shannon Watts thinks it would have been better if the armed civilian hadn’t been armed and instead had just sat there as the shooter gunned people down. Better still would’ve been if the civilian had allowed himself to be a casualty!

Watts appears to have deleted this tweet for some reason (at least it’s not coming up for us in a search):

You know who needs to hear that, Shannon? Nobody. Nobody needs to hear that. Because it’s moronic and downright offensive.

She’d only be thankful if she could use what happened in Greenwood to push her agenda. Instead, that 22-year-old armed civilian left her gun control narrative riddled with holes.

Advertisement

Once again, we don’t know who needs to hear this, but:

***

Related:

What agenda? USA Today’s editors allow Shannon Watts to completely misrepresent Amy Coney Barrett on the Second Amendment

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement