Comrade Mamdani’s DSA Just Pledged to 'Defend' Chinese Socialism — Peak Democrat Energy
'Dems Deliver' Account Celebrates NY Bill That Would Only Deliver Higher Prices at...
Dem Running for Maine Senate Troy Jackson Completely Blank on Tourist Spots in...
Senate Candidate Troy Jackson Is TRYING to Change the Subject to Susan Collins...
Seattle Mayor Forces Black Police Chief to Resign As Scapegoat for Shooting Chaos...
Dylan Mulvaney Has a 'Dolls Night Out' With 'Sarah' McBride and the Jokes...
Silly Prison Abolitionist Thinks Cages Are Cruel—Wait Until He Sees What the Pitchforks...
Hunter Biden Blames Trump Family for His Woes While Cursing Them All—Including the...
Mehdi Hasan’s Knickers in a Full Twist After Haley Stevens Tells His Fake-Doctor...
Ketanji Brown Jackson Is Picky About Media Choices to Convey Impartiality (Guess Where...
'What's the Mood on BlueSky?' Host Ken Jennings Hears His Toughest Jeopardy Question...
Streamer Hasan Piker Who Said America Deserved 9/11 Guarantees 2028 Dem Nominee Will...
Legacy Media Outlets Downplay Moroccans Swarming Into Spain, Focus on ‘Right-Wing’ Respons...
White Site: Kamala Harris’s DEI Devotion Ends at Border of Her Swanky New...
Sen. Corey Booker Observes Brian Sicknick Day in New Jersey, Who Gave His...

Kamala Harris: Overturning Roe v. Wade would be 'a direct assault on the fundamental right [...] to live and love without' gov't interference [video]

Vice President Kamala Harris can barely string a sentence together, but for some reason, she continues to get trotted out to weigh in on important issues.

Well, the abortion debate is nothing if not an important issue, and Harris has some thoughts on it. In this video, she sums up why it’s absolutely crucial that Roe v. Wade be preserved for posterity:

Advertisement

If the Supreme Court issues a ruling that effectively overturns Roe v. Wade, “it would be a direct assault on the fundamental right to self-determination, to live and love without interference from the government. At its core, this is about our future as a nation, about whether we live in a country where the government can interfere in personal decisions.”

First of all, who is she talking to?

Second of all, her “live and love” stuff makes it sound like she thinks she’s arguing in favor of gay marriage, which has been upheld by SCOTUS already and isn’t really at risk of going anywhere. And what about the unborn’s fundamental right to live and love (and be loved)?

Third of all, since when does she care about the government interfering in personal decisions? She had no problems whatsoever with government interference in personal decisions when it came to COVID, for example.

Advertisement

And fourth, and most importantly, of all, why, for the love of God, is she here?

It is weird. And they do it constantly.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement