Tulsi Gabbard's Confirmation Vote Delayed Due to Dusting of Snow
BREAKING: American Marc Fogel Lands in America, Another Prisoner to be Released Wednesday
AP Reporter Blocked from Oval Office for Deadnaming Gulf of America After Textual...
Can’t See the Forest for the Reeees: Animal Rights Activists Imitate Coyotes to...
Rep. Pramila Jayapal Says People Didn't Vote for Elon Musk to Cut Cancer...
Sister of Freed American Hostage Says Trump Promised Mother He Would Get Him...
CNN’s Kaitlan Collins Breaks Down the 'Dangerously Close' Constitutional Crisis
Protest-at-Home? Massive Government Union Fields Tiny Crowd for Weak Anti-DOGE March
'Scorched Earth': Rep. Nancy Mace Gives Brutal Floor Speech Calling Out Sexual Predators
Trump: ‘There’s Nothing to Buy … We Will Have Gaza’
On Illegal Immigration, Popes in Walled Castles Shouldn't Throw Stones
Judge Orders Trump to Restore Deleted HSS, CDC, FDA Webpages on Transgenderism
The Force Is With Her: Gina Carano Marks Four Year Anniversary of Disney's...
Welcome to the Machine: A Totally Non-Organic ‘CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS!’ Legacy Media Montag...
Oh Tay Tay! Glamour Mag Blames Trump, 'Toxic Masculinity' for Booing Taylor Swift...

Kamala Harris: Overturning Roe v. Wade would be 'a direct assault on the fundamental right [...] to live and love without' gov't interference [video]

Vice President Kamala Harris can barely string a sentence together, but for some reason, she continues to get trotted out to weigh in on important issues.

Well, the abortion debate is nothing if not an important issue, and Harris has some thoughts on it. In this video, she sums up why it’s absolutely crucial that Roe v. Wade be preserved for posterity:

Advertisement

If the Supreme Court issues a ruling that effectively overturns Roe v. Wade, “it would be a direct assault on the fundamental right to self-determination, to live and love without interference from the government. At its core, this is about our future as a nation, about whether we live in a country where the government can interfere in personal decisions.”

First of all, who is she talking to?

Second of all, her “live and love” stuff makes it sound like she thinks she’s arguing in favor of gay marriage, which has been upheld by SCOTUS already and isn’t really at risk of going anywhere. And what about the unborn’s fundamental right to live and love (and be loved)?

Third of all, since when does she care about the government interfering in personal decisions? She had no problems whatsoever with government interference in personal decisions when it came to COVID, for example.

Advertisement

And fourth, and most importantly, of all, why, for the love of God, is she here?

It is weird. And they do it constantly.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement