Dem Sen. Amy Klobuchar Seems Proud of This 'Power Photo' With Face the...
OOF! Harry Sisson and His Fruity Drink Learn the Hard Way You Do...
Gender Affirming Care Getting Worldwide Examination
BREAKING: At Least Five People Shot at Christian School in Madison, Wisconsin
We Are SOOO Back! Trump Puts Reporter In His PLACE With PERFECT Comeback...
'Better Off Saying What It Is': Trump Says Biden Admin Won't Divulge What's...
Holy Full of CRAP, Batman! Extreme Hakeem Jeffries Daily Dose of DUMB About...
CNN's Jim Acosta Laments Trump Suing Media Into Settlements for 'Simply Doing Their...
Bro, NO! Jake Tapper Makes TOOL of Himself Calling MASSIVE CNN EFF-UP in...
Most CNN Thing EVER: Prisoner CNN Reporter Helped 'Free' Is Really Assad-Regime Torturer
'Surprise Endorsement'! Politico Warns About 'Vision' Pete Hegseth Would Bring to Defense...
J.K. Rowling Gives Social Media a 'Smile Break' With Her Pet Pictures Request
SCIENCE! Just for Fun Here Are 5 of My Favorite Climate Change Doomsday...
Sheldon Whitehouse DRAGGED for Unhinged, Paranoid AF Thread About 'Far Right' Declaring Wa...
Just WOW: Chris Murphy Justifies Political Violence (Murder?!) and Scott Jennings Ain't Ha...

NYT's own reporting torpedoes the entire premise of their hit piece sliming Elon Musk as pro-apartheid racist

Earlier, we told you about the New York Times’ insanely offensive hit piece intended pretty explicitly to paint him as a pro-apartheid racist.

Advertisement

Our jaws are still on the floor.

It’s almost as if the article’s author came up with the headline first and then decided to work backward from there.

Based on the headline alone, we wouldn’t blame you in the least for not wanting to give the actual piece the time of day.

And maybe the New York Times is actually counting on that in a weird way, because if you actually read the article, you’ll find that it contains passages that torpedo the entire premise. That’s what journalist Peter Hamby found when he read it:

Since Elon Musk himself refused to give the New York Times any comment about his childhood, the Times was forced to look for comment from people who knew Musk as a child. And those people refuted the notion that Musk was an apartheid-loving bigot.

Advertisement

This is media malpractice, pure and simple.

What an absolute sh*tshow the New York Times is.

It’s incredible in that the New York Times will continue to blow smoke up their own butt about their journalistic integrity and their unimpeachable journalistic and moral standards. But this sort of “journalism” from the New York Times isn’t really all that incredible. Not anymore. This is their brand now, and we have absolutely no trouble believing that they’ll continue to find new lows to which they can stoop.

Advertisement

You should be disgusted by all of it. Because all of it is disgusting.

The New York Times doesn’t care about legitimacy. That’s why they’re still around.

Editor’s note: This post has been updated with additional text and tweets.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement