Jim Acosta Gets a First Amendment Schooling While on the 'Journalism Is Under...
Deport Every Single Illegal Alien Possible
Democrats Playing With Dynamite on Another Shutdown
Delicious! Abby Phillip Gets HOUSED by Lydia Moynihan About the Facts of Don...
NY Times' Condemnation of Don Lemon's Arrest Avoids Key Facts (Effort to Protect...
Mother Jones: 'Churches We Don't Like Don't Get First Amendment Protection' (or Something)
DNC's Words Come Back to Bite Them After Call to 'Free Don Lemon'...
Oh, NO! Secretary General Warns that the UN Might Be on the Verge...
LAWSPLAINING: Detransitioner Wins $2 Million Judgment Against Psychologist and Surgeon
Color Commentary: Jim Acosta Says Don Lemon Is Being Targeted for His Race,...
Love to See It: Judgmental 'Journo' Don Lemon Gets Caught in His Own...
Taxpayer-Funded Schools Escort Kids to Anti-ICE Protest Instead of Class – Abbott Demands...
A Deep Dive into the Lemon Indictment: Are Lemon’s First Amendment Rights Being...
Boca Grande's Elite: No Parking for You, But Save Our Cheap Help from...
Connected Lefty Jamael Lundy, Married to Council Member and Running for Office, Busted...

Country star John Rich has a theory about what's behind the apparent ubiquity of fact-checkers

Fact-checking has enjoyed quite a renaissance over the past seven years or so. Like since 2015. There’s lots to choose from, but for the sake of time, we’ll remind you of two particularly fine fact-checks by the fine folks at PolitiFact.

Advertisement

There was their fact-check of Fox Business’ Maria Bartiromo, whose claims about U.S. oil imports from Russia were declared “Mostly False” despite the fact that, as PolitiFact themselves acknowledged, she was right.

They also tackled Virginia Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s accurate remark that Virginia is one of only a handful of states that tax veterans’ retirement. They were somewhat easier on him, declaring his statement “Half True.”

If not for Republicans, we don’t know what PolitFact would do with their time. A few more recent examples:

To be fair, Democrats are also the subject of PolitiFact fact-checks — when Republicans or conservatives criticize them, at least. For example:

Advertisement

Readers are well aware that there are plenty more examples of both types of fact-checks where those came from.

Anyway, country star John Rich is neither a politician nor a journalist nor a professional fact-checker, but he’s been watching and observing and he thinks he may have solved the mystery of how fact-checking became so popular and interesting:

We’re not going to speak for him, but we feel pretty comfortable getting the impression that Rich isn’t actually suggesting that fact-checking is a novel thing that didn’t exist until relatively recently. However, if we consider the sort of journalism that’s presented as “fact-checking” these days, we’d say that Rich might be onto something.

We’re not sure what’s so difficult for Keith Olbermann to understand. Then again, he’s not known for his intellect. What the hell John Rich’s tweet is supposed to mean is that fact-checking didn’t matter much to the Left until they had to contend with critics speaking inconvenient truths. In the grand scheme of things, he’s not wrong. Far too many current-day “fact-checkers” follow PolitiFact’s model and try to discredit or shut down Republicans or conservatives who say something true and try to run interference for Democrats and liberals whose lies and flaws are exposed.

Advertisement

Obviously there are exceptions, but by and large, the art of “fact-checking” has become about little more than carrying the Left’s water. Keith Olbermann et al. can fact-check that as much as they want, but if they’re being honest, they’ll find that Rich’s statement is pretty darn compelling.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement