Conan O’Brien Jokes That at Least in Britain, They Arrest Their Pedophiles
TIME Lists Some of the Ways the Operation Epic Fury Money Could Have...
Cesar Chavez Too 'Problematic' Even for the Left? UFW Ditches Founder Amid Sexual...
Proposed Rule Could Ban Trump From Major International Events, Including the Olympics
Warner Goes From Calling Kent Dangerous to High-Fiving His Resignation – TDS Strikes...
Hearing a 27-Year-Old Mom Say She Feels Nothing for Her Baby Broke Me—Because...
Cato Director: Immigrants Reduce Crime Rates, So You’re Less Likely to Be a...
Talarico Goes Full Vegan: Because Nothing Screams 'Elect Me' Like Banning Brisket in...
California’s First Partner Says Don’t Listen to Bullies Like President Trump
Fairfax Schools Releases Worthless Statement Regarding Illegal Who Groped a Dozen Girls
Governor Newsom's Press Office Gets Ratioed INTO THE SUN by Nick Shirley (and...
Ireland’s New President Says ‘Patrick’ Reminds Us of the Courage and Resilience of...
NYT's Kristof Laments Iranian Butcher as 'Pragmatic Peace Partner' After Israel Takes Him...
Bodycam Video Released of Jasmine Crockett’s Bodyguard Pulling a Gun on Police
From Rolling Stone to NYT: Editor Accused of Shielding Friend in Child Porn...

Country star John Rich has a theory about what's behind the apparent ubiquity of fact-checkers

Fact-checking has enjoyed quite a renaissance over the past seven years or so. Like since 2015. There’s lots to choose from, but for the sake of time, we’ll remind you of two particularly fine fact-checks by the fine folks at PolitiFact.

Advertisement

There was their fact-check of Fox Business’ Maria Bartiromo, whose claims about U.S. oil imports from Russia were declared “Mostly False” despite the fact that, as PolitiFact themselves acknowledged, she was right.

They also tackled Virginia Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s accurate remark that Virginia is one of only a handful of states that tax veterans’ retirement. They were somewhat easier on him, declaring his statement “Half True.”

If not for Republicans, we don’t know what PolitFact would do with their time. A few more recent examples:

To be fair, Democrats are also the subject of PolitiFact fact-checks — when Republicans or conservatives criticize them, at least. For example:

Advertisement

Readers are well aware that there are plenty more examples of both types of fact-checks where those came from.

Anyway, country star John Rich is neither a politician nor a journalist nor a professional fact-checker, but he’s been watching and observing and he thinks he may have solved the mystery of how fact-checking became so popular and interesting:

We’re not going to speak for him, but we feel pretty comfortable getting the impression that Rich isn’t actually suggesting that fact-checking is a novel thing that didn’t exist until relatively recently. However, if we consider the sort of journalism that’s presented as “fact-checking” these days, we’d say that Rich might be onto something.

We’re not sure what’s so difficult for Keith Olbermann to understand. Then again, he’s not known for his intellect. What the hell John Rich’s tweet is supposed to mean is that fact-checking didn’t matter much to the Left until they had to contend with critics speaking inconvenient truths. In the grand scheme of things, he’s not wrong. Far too many current-day “fact-checkers” follow PolitiFact’s model and try to discredit or shut down Republicans or conservatives who say something true and try to run interference for Democrats and liberals whose lies and flaws are exposed.

Advertisement

Obviously there are exceptions, but by and large, the art of “fact-checking” has become about little more than carrying the Left’s water. Keith Olbermann et al. can fact-check that as much as they want, but if they’re being honest, they’ll find that Rich’s statement is pretty darn compelling.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement