Looking at Abdul El-Sayed's 2021 Post About 9/11, We Can See WHY He...
*SNICKER* Scott Bessent Pats Canada on the Head – You Can’t Tit-For-Tat a...
We Can't Get Over Maxwell Frost's FACE As He Squirms While Taxpayers LIGHT...
SHE'S GONNA BLOOOW! Even MS NOW Wouldn’t Drop Hasan Piker — and Debbie...
TKO! Ben Shapiro TORCHES Zohran Mamdani for Airbrushing 9/11 Into Everything BUT a...
No, Marjorie. You Should Apologize to Trump and Everyone Else You Conned
LOL! Oh DAMN! DHS Hands NYTimes Its Backside in HEATED Debate Over ‘Harrowing’...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Ponder and Pander: Dem Ro Khanna Eyes Presidential Run and Says Jasmine Crockett...
Buc-ee’s CEO Says Future Focus Will Be on Opening Stores in Red States,...
Beyond the Pale: Maxine Waters Says ‘White Media’ Is Stoking Conflict Between Dem...
James Clyburn Regrets Supporting Clarence Thomas SCOTUS Confirmation, Feels Betrayed He’s...
El-Sayed Tells MI Jewish Dems He Stands by ‘Hurt People Hurt People’ —...
American Kids Are Losing Their Grandparents to The Villages
America’s Coziest New Family Tradition: Listing Your Psych Meds at Dinner

CNN's John Harwood greets news that Nancy Pelosi may appoint Adam Kinzinger to January 6 committee as a win for 'truth' and 'reality'

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is reportedly considering adding GOP congressman and outspoken Donald Trump critic Adam Kinzinger to the select committee on the January 6 riots:

Advertisement

Honestly, we could see it. Kinzinger seems like the perfect pick for Pelosi, because he’s a Republican whose personal aversion to Donald Trump has caused him to be more open to renouncing some of his professed conservatism. Pelosi might think that Kinzinger lends her side more credibility. And there are people out there who’d agree with her.

Advertisement

See, that’s the thing: choosing Kinzinger would suggest that Pelosi’s critics are right to be concerned about Democrats using the committee as an opportunity to go after Donald Trump as opposed to getting to the bottom of the riots in earnest.

Anyway, we fully expect out-and-proud partisans like Trump-supporter-turned-liberal-Dem David Weissman to champion the addition of Adam Kinzinger to the committee. But one would think that an ostensibly objective journalist like John Harwood would at least try to sound a little more objective when he covers it.

Alas, John Harwood gonna John Harwood:

God forbid Harwood simply report that Pelosi may appoint Adam Kinzinger to the committee. He could’ve stopped there and been fine. But he just had to go and editorialize by emphasizing that Kinzinger and Liz Cheney “embrace reality/tell the truth.”

Advertisement

Of course Harwood’s CNN colleague Jim Acosta would retweet it:

Real News™ (Mr. President) men of a feather, you know.

If John Harwood honestly believes that Adam Kinzinger and Liz Cheney’s sole intentions are to “illuminate” the truth when they have both been very vocal about their belief that Donald Trump is to blame for the riots, then he’s delusional. Kinzinger and Cheney have just as much of an agenda as everyone else does.

And if Harwood knows that and is pretending otherwise, then he’s obscuring the truth for his followers.

Correct.

Advertisement

No wonder Harwood’s so excited.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement