That’s Eracism!: Stanford University Gets Caught AI-Altering Ad Photo to Make Students Mor...
The Banish Acquisition: Insiders Say Mood at CNN Is Like a Funeral After...
El-Sayed and El-Salad: Dem Enlists Kamala Harris to Win Over ‘Black Birthing People’...
Minister From James Talarico’s Church Admits They’re Not a Belief-Based Church
Since 1986, Geraldo Rivera Has Never Met a Rake He Couldn't Step On
CNN's Brian Stelter Says There Will Almost Certainly Be Layoffs After Paramount Merger
Boston Globe: Queer Community Splintered Over Lesbian Bar That Dropped Strict Mask Mandate
CBS News: Critics Say Converse 'Lynching' Ad May Have Been Intentionally Crafted to...
Vandals Spray-Paint ‘Kill Donald Trump’ and ‘Talarico — Love Wins’ at Site of...
Grand Jury Finds Zero Evidence of Foul Play in Death of Black Teen;...
Chris Christie Is Thinking About 2028, and X Has Thoughts
The Snark Is Strong With This One: JD Vance Echoes His Boss With...
What Alaska’s 50+ Voters Are Saying About the Senate Race
Choice of Color: Podcaster Joy Reid Sides With Clancy Trial Holdout Juror for...
Trump Made His First Remarks Without the TV Pool and Reviews Are Enthusiastic

Dana Loesch wants to know if this also violates YouTube's 'standards' [video]

A lot of the people criticizing YouTube today for demonetizing Steven Crowder’s channel are pointing to late-night hosts’ own nasty work, which for some reason hasn’t been targeted by the lefty outrage mob for similar punishment.

Advertisement

On that note, Dana Loesch has a question for YouTube as well:

Here’s a refresher, for those of you who missed it the first time around:

We’re no experts or anything, but that seems at least as “egregious” as some of Crowder’s alleged “egregious actions.”

Advertisement

Notice Loesch isn’t calling for Colbert’s head on a pike. But she does deserve an answer from the YouTube speech police.

The thing is, we probably already do.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement