Bloomberg Columnist Was Wrong About Thinking Biden Couldn't Bring Down Crime Rates
Wholesome Politics? Young Trump Supporter in Tears After Meeting His Idol
Healing the Soul of the Nation: DHS Says Trump Supporters, Military and Religious...
You Don't Despise the Media Enough: AP LGBTQ+ Librarians Are Under Attack, Just...
Daily Mail Exposes Sag Harbor Cop Who Reminds Wealthy Residents Like Timberlake They're...
NYT: The War in Gaza Is Dividing the LGBTQ Community
BREAKING: Republican Adam Kinzinger Is Voting for Biden
Extreme Hakeem Jeffries Figures Out the REAL Money Problem Americans Face, Price Gouging
Politico Going All-Out to Defend Pro-Hamas Rep. Jamaal Bowman
Are Trans Activists in a Hate Movement, or Just Vulnerable Victims of Oppression?...
‘Christian' Incels Harassing Trans Activist for Educating Folx on Nazis
'Cheap Fake' Video Shows President Biden Sprinting to Marine One
VIP: Kermit Versus Kamala Could Give Us a Vice Presidential Debate Worth Watching
Head of LGBTQ of Maryland Busted Over Texts With 14-Year-Old
AOC Goes ‘Full Cringe Mode’ at Bronx Rally

'Creative judicial nonsense'! Connecticut Supreme Court rules that Remington can be sued for Sandy Hook shooting

Farewell, personal responsibility. You had a good run:

Advertisement

Did the Connecticut Supreme Court consult with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for this case?

Unless of course, the goal is to punish gun manufacturers.

The latter. Definitely the latter.

Advertisement

More:

Justices issued a 4-3 decision that reinstated a wrongful death lawsuit and overturned a lower court ruling that the lawsuit was prohibited by a 2005 federal law that shields gun manufacturers from liability in most cases when their products are used in crimes.

The plaintiffs include a survivor and relatives of nine people killed in the massacre. They argue the AR-15-style rifle used by shooter Adam Lanza is too dangerous for the public and Remington glorified the weapon in marketing it to young people.

Remington has denied wrongdoing and previously insisted it can’t be sued under the federal law.

The majority of the high court agreed with most of the lower court’s ruling and dismissed most of the lawsuit’s allegations, but allowed a wrongful marketing claim to proceed.

“The regulation of advertising that threatens the public’s health, safety, and morals has long been considered a core exercise of the states’ police powers,” Justice Richard Palmer wrote for the majority.

OK, now that we’ve read that … the decision is most definitely still stupid.

Advertisement

Yeah, well, something tells us this case isn’t closed just yet.

We sincerely hope so.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement