Chinese Account Likes AI Propaganda Video Showing US Airman Bombing a Little Girl...
Katie Couric Explains the SAVE Act, Says Voter Fraud Is ‘Vanishingly Rare’
Remember Mamdani's 'She's Just a Private Citizen' Line? NY Mag Begs to Differ:...
Daily Mail: 'Staggering' Number of US Troops Wounded in War With Iran
Harvey Weinstein Calls Rikers 'Hell' — Turns Out Power Dynamics Suck When You're...
DNC Suing to Compel the Trump Administration to Say If It's Planning to...
MD's Eye-Opening Thread: Be Cordial, But Hover Like a Hawk – Hospital Horror...
Here We GO! Georgia US House 14 Special Election General Results LIVE With...
‘Media Personality’ Notes Pete Hegseth Doesn’t Salute Black Service Member
Weird Lefty Wonders Why Kai Trump Could 'Irreversibly Transition' Her Teeth as a...
Bill Maher Tells Podcaster His Position Feels Like 'Someone Who Just Wants to...
DHS Says News Report of US Citizen Being Detained for Two Days is...
Shots Fired at US Consulate in Toronto, RCMP Confirms It's a National Security...
This Hero Wears Blue: Viral Image of NYPD Chief Inspires Hope Among New...
Latest Poll Shows American Democrats Are the Most Ungrateful, Miserable SOBs on the...

'This is duuuuuumb': CNN's Chris Cillizza can't resist urge to 'mansplain' music to Nikki Haley

The day after Nikki Haley criticized the Grammys’ bizarre and asinine “Fire and Fury” stunt, the media still can’t wrap their heads around it.

Advertisement

As Twitchy told you, the New York Times’ Dave Itzkoff has been mocking Haley for her very valid issues with what happened. Not to be outdone, CNN’s Chris Cillizza has chimed in with an “analysis” to explain why Haley was wrong to suggest that the Grammys have gotten too political:

Though Cillizza does acknowledge that “Haley has a right to be annoyed” by the glorification of “Fire and Fury,” he concludes:

What draws people to music is the personal stories behind the music — the “why” of the lyrics. To ask musicians to be robots robs music of its real meaning.

Yes, the fact that musicians are people expressing their views can be uncomfortable. I have been at a show where a musician went off on a long rant about the media and how we were complicit in something or other. People cheered. I didn’t. But I didn’t think to myself: “Why can’t this guy just sing the songs?” Because that’s part of the deal you make when you listen to music: The artist gets to express himself or herself and you get to react to it. It is not the artist’s job to make sure that reaction is a pleasant one. In fact, it may be the artist’s job to make sure that reaction is unsettling — or at the least thought provoking.

That’s what Haley seemed to miss in her tweet. Being frustrated about a book is one thing. Urging musicians to take politics out of their music is another — and misses the point of music totally.

Advertisement

If anyone here has missed the point, it’s Cillizza. The “Fire and Fury” bit wasn’t meant to be thought-provoking; it was designed purely to take cheap shots at Trump and his administration. There was nothing clever or edgy about it; it was just tiresome and lazy.

Yes it is.

https://twitter.com/ElliottRHams/status/958034084290351104

Maybe instead of looking for reasons to pick on Haley, Cillizza should concede that she might be onto something:

It’s almost as if a lot of Americans are fed up with the hyperpoliticization of their favorite things.

https://twitter.com/Rob_Tussin/status/958037360322674689

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement