Four Americans slaughtered in Benghazi weren’t worth Hillary’s time and energy, but civil war in Syria? She’s not gonna stand for that.
The former secretary of state weighed in this afternoon on possible military strikes against Syria:
NOW: Hillary Clinton on Syria: there should be a "response led by the United States." pic.twitter.com/MGTSasAxKE
— NewsBreaker (@NewsBreaker) September 9, 2013
Clinton was careful to highlight the humanitarian imperative to take action:
The plight of Syrian civilians “demands a strong response from the international community, led by the United States.”
Ambassador Chris Stevens, Ty Woods, Glen Doherty, and Sean Smith, the brave men who perished on September 11, 2012, could not be reached for comment.
Hillary Clinton has spoken more on Syria than she ever has on Benghazi.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 9, 2013
Disgraceful. Where was Hillary’s outrage on Benghazi? Where was her call to action then?
"@CarolCNN: Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton worked the phones for President Obama on Syria" to bad she didn't for benghazi
— rbortins (@rbortins) September 9, 2013
The Benghazi 4 cry from the grave for justice and Hillary moved on to Syria!
"What does it matter?"
— Ernest Johnson (@ernest_ernesw) September 9, 2013
— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) September 9, 2013
— Eric Giese ?? ? (@RealEricGiese) September 9, 2013
Hillary Clinton to help sell attack on Syria. 1400 gassed. Want to ask her: At this point, what possible difference can it make?
— Phoo Barre (@PhooBarre) September 9, 2013
— AmericanLoyal ?????♀️#MAGA (@Arkydiva) September 9, 2013
Hillary Clinton on Syria: What difference does it make!??? Oh, wait, that was her response to Benghazi as Secretary of State #shesajoke
— Rick Joslyn (@RickyJTweets) September 9, 2013