"We're Not Stupid': BLM Leader Endorses ...Wait for It ... TRUMP
Elon Musk Has Harsh Words for Advertisers Who Are 'Blackmailing' Him
Sen. Chuck Schumer Admits Wave of Antisemitism Is Coming From the Left
Pro-Hamas Demonstrators Clash with Police, Attempt to Disrupt Rockefeller Center Christmas...
Henry Kissinger Dies at 100
Child Hostage of Hamas Reportedly Held in Attic by a UN Teacher
Sports Illustrated Used AI To Publish Articles By Non-Existent Writers
For No Good Reason Leftists Are FURIOUS About Melania's Outfit at Rosalynn Carter's...
'Unfathomably Based': Elon Musk Will Not Be Blackmailed by Advertisers
Kamala Harris Blames Her Unpopularity on the Sexist and Racist Media
We Regret to Inform You That Keith Olbermann Has Returned to Twitter
Kamala Harris Doesn't Answer When Asked If Israel Is Following the Rules of...
CBS News Explores the Hopes and Dreams of Young Palestinian Prisoners Released
Tired of People Being Allowed to Talk to You? Then Do We Have...
Biden Gets Roasted After Insisting He Kept the Promise to Be a President...

‘Earnest’ Univision ‘journalist’ seeks pat on the head for relabeling Malkin 'conservative columnist'

Yesterday, Univision “real journalist” and super-special snowflake Cristina Costantini was busted for intellectual inconsistency. When writing about Wednesday’s honest, civil Twitter debate between Michelle Malkin and José Vargas, Costantini referred to Malkin as a “right-wing columnist.” By contrast, she called Vargas, an out-and-proud illegal immigrant and amnesty proponent a “journalist.” Evidently, Vargas’ bias wasn’t notable.


Costantini was taken aback when Malkin and Twitchy called her out on her sneakiness, and this morning, she penned an “earnest” column to tell her side of the story:


Here’s one of her “clarifications”:

I thought Michelle Malkin classified herself as a “right-wing columnist,” so I thought it would be an appropriate description. I made that assumption based on her website’s description of her here. I’ve amended her description to “conservative columnist” because she seems to prefer it for herself and seems to have objected to my prior naming. An editor also suggested last night that “right-wing” comes off as pejorative, while another editor said it does not. Does it? I didn’t think so, but let me know in the comments if you think it does. I’m also genuinely curious if Malkin finds “right-wing” to be inaccurate or vastly different from the word “conservative.”

Malkin took issue with being called “right-wing” as opposed to “conservative?” Um, no. The problem we have with Costantini’s form of “real journalism” is not that she acknowledges bias in others; it’s that she does not do so consistently. Why is ideology only pertinent when conservatives are concerned, but not when it comes to left-leaning members of the media? Costantini has failed to address the real problem. Is she being disingenuous? Is she just dense? We eagerly await her “earnest” response to those questions.




Since Costantini seems to have such a difficult time admitting that she did anything wrong, Malkin kindly broke it down for her:

These readers get it:



Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Twitchy Videos