Rubio Tuesday
James Woods Calls Out Jennifer Newsom for Telling Prisoners Their Crimes Were Probably...
Scum of the Earth Stick Together: Cheating Ruben Gallego Defends Eric Swalwell Amid...
Iranian TV: Iranians Locking Arms to Form Human Shields Around Power Plants
President Trump Is Fighting For Mideast Peace
Iranian Embassies and Consulates Out of the Blast Zone Mock Trump’s Deadline
Dems Got the Memo: We Need to Invoke the 25th Amendment and Remove...
Nutball GA Democrat Running for Office Outlines How She'll PUNISH Trump Supporters if...
Political ‘Expert’ Flips OUT, REFUSES to Believe Abigail Spanberger Is Already SO Unpopula...
Trump Traumatizes Schumer & Jeffries As Democrats Move to Remove Him Immediately
Women Torch Eric Swalwell on X After He Drops 'Won't Back Down' Ad...
Scott Jennings HUMILIATES an ENTIRE CNN Panel Hemming and Hawing Over the Poor...
Is it Just Me, Or Does This Donut Ad From Eric Swalwell's Campaign...
WOMP WOMPITY WOMP! Check Out WHY a Federal Court Shut Down Tim Walz's...
Greg Gutfeld's Reaction to Trump Saying The Five Would Be Better Without Jessica...

If we didn't know any better, we might think Shannon Watts was disappointed more people weren't murdered in Greenwood mall shooting

Earlier, we told you about Brady Campaign President Kris Brown’s ridiculous and deranged take on the lawful concealed carrier who took down a man who opened fire on shoppers at the Greenwood Park Mall in Greenwood, Indiana, yesterday. Thanks to that “Good Samaritan’s” swift action, lives were saved.

Advertisement

Gun control advocates have been weirdly angry that the gunman didn’t succeed in killing more than three innocent people. It’s like they’re looking for a reason to make the hero out to be the bad guy in the scenario.

Well, needless to say, Moms Demand founder and ghoulish gun-grabber Shannon Watts is very, very disappointed in the man who stopped a mass shooting from being far deadlier, and according to her, his heroism is just further evidence that the Second Amendment isn’t all it’s cracked up to be:

Advertisement

It almost sounds like Shannon Watts thinks it would have been better if the armed civilian hadn’t been armed and instead had just sat there as the shooter gunned people down. Better still would’ve been if the civilian had allowed himself to be a casualty!

Watts appears to have deleted this tweet for some reason (at least it’s not coming up for us in a search):

You know who needs to hear that, Shannon? Nobody. Nobody needs to hear that. Because it’s moronic and downright offensive.

She’d only be thankful if she could use what happened in Greenwood to push her agenda. Instead, that 22-year-old armed civilian left her gun control narrative riddled with holes.

Advertisement

Once again, we don’t know who needs to hear this, but:

***

Related:

What agenda? USA Today’s editors allow Shannon Watts to completely misrepresent Amy Coney Barrett on the Second Amendment

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement