PA Supreme Court Justice David Wecht Leaves Democratic Party Over Rise in Antisemitism
Dem Katie Porter Says Fellow Gubernatorial Candidate Leaked Video of Her Verbally Abusing...
Politico ‘Journo’ Warns Republicans They’ll Be Called ‘Racists’ for Umpteenth Time If VRA...
Dem FCC Official Tells Jimmy Kimmel Bestie Jake Tapper About Trump's Effort to...
Spanish Police Fear Islamist Terrorists Taking Advantage of Massive Grant of Legal Status
WaPo: Immigrants Are Giving Up Their Cases and Leaving In Soaring Numbers
Hantavirus Cruise Ship Scare Hits Nebraska; Experts Say No Pandemic Risk — Lockdown...
Chris Van Hollen: If You’re Mad Trump’s Trying to Muzzle Jimmy Kimmel, Be...
D'OH! The Left's Redistricting Efforts in the Courts Continue to Backfire (Cue MORE...
Backfire: Family Demands Answers in Police Shooting, Gets Them in Bodycam Footage
Shuttering Chicago Walgreens Says It Lost $1 Million, Mostly Due to Theft
Just When You Thought California Couldn't Get Worse: Arcadia Mayor Busted as Chinese...
Chelsea Handler’s 'Brutal' Draft Roast Implodes: Ma’am, Men Have Been Registering at 18...
White TN State Rep Mobbed by Racists in Scene Reminiscent of Little Rock...
The Bulwark's Sam Stein Spins His Latest Fiction: Turns Duffy's Weekend Drives Into...

Kamala Harris: Overturning Roe v. Wade would be 'a direct assault on the fundamental right [...] to live and love without' gov't interference [video]

Vice President Kamala Harris can barely string a sentence together, but for some reason, she continues to get trotted out to weigh in on important issues.

Well, the abortion debate is nothing if not an important issue, and Harris has some thoughts on it. In this video, she sums up why it’s absolutely crucial that Roe v. Wade be preserved for posterity:

Advertisement

If the Supreme Court issues a ruling that effectively overturns Roe v. Wade, “it would be a direct assault on the fundamental right to self-determination, to live and love without interference from the government. At its core, this is about our future as a nation, about whether we live in a country where the government can interfere in personal decisions.”

First of all, who is she talking to?

Second of all, her “live and love” stuff makes it sound like she thinks she’s arguing in favor of gay marriage, which has been upheld by SCOTUS already and isn’t really at risk of going anywhere. And what about the unborn’s fundamental right to live and love (and be loved)?

Third of all, since when does she care about the government interfering in personal decisions? She had no problems whatsoever with government interference in personal decisions when it came to COVID, for example.

Advertisement

And fourth, and most importantly, of all, why, for the love of God, is she here?

It is weird. And they do it constantly.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement