Bulwark Founder FANGIRLS Over 'Brand New to Politics' Graham Platner Who She Claims...
Jon Ossoff Just Admitted How OBSESSED He Is With Trump (and That He...
Turns Out Robo-Talarico's 'Bot Problem Goes WAY Deeper Than Just 2 Clips' (Is...
BRUTAL Post Sums Up Graham Platner Campaign's Three-Act Farce: Threaten, Lie, Then Lie...
Standing by Maine KAMPF! Jessica Tarlov's BUT TRUMP Defense of Graham Platner Goes...
REVOLTING: Megyn Kelly Didn't Just Let Her Mask Slip on Israel; She Pulled...
SF Chronicle Gets Community Note Nuked Over 'Open Hostility to Gay Rights' in...
Byron York SHUTS George Conway's BRAG of Helping E. Jean Carroll Sue Trump...
How DARE They?! Jill Biden Melts DOWN When NBC Finally Pushes Back on...
WOOF: DEEP-DIVE Into Graham Platner’s Handler, Morris Katz, Explains SO MUCH & Ain't...
Graham Platner and Staff Were Eager to Take Questions After This Campaign Event...
Cenk Uygur and Hasan Piker BODIED After Blaming Israel for UK Ban (Real...
DHS Reality Checks and Wrecks Hakeem Jeffries Over an ICE Detention Center and...
Monday Morning Meme Madness

Federal Appeals Court Finds Trump’s Transgender Military Ban Unconstitutional, Based Upon Animus

AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein

Happy Pride Month, everyone! Settle in for the next 30 days and be thankful it's not 31.

As we reported last month, a judge threw out the human trafficking case against Maryland man Kilmar Abrego Garcia, claiming that it was "vindictive prosecution" by the Trump administration after being embarrassed by having to bring Abrego Garcia back to the U.S. from El Salvador, his home country. Now, in a 2-1 ruling, a three-judge panel has found that the Trump administration's policy banning transgender individuals from serving in the military is unconstitutional, with one judge writing that it appeared to be driven by "the bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group."

Advertisement

The post continues:

… upon animus, and for those reasons the Policy violates Plaintiff-Appellees' constitutional right to equal protection of the law."

ABC News added that Judge Roger Wilkins wrote that the ban "appears to be driven by the bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group" and that "the decision only applies to the service members who sued the administration and does not bar the Pentagon from blocking transgender people from joining the military."

Advertisement
Advertisement

No, but you can't disqualify people from "politically unpopular groups." You can disqualify them for hundreds of other reasons, but not that one.

***

Editor's Note: Unelected federal judges are hijacking President Trump's agenda and insulting the will of the people.

Help us expose out-of-control judges dead set on halting President Trump's mandate for change. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement