Rumors Squashed: Knicks Confirm White House Visit as Libs Melt Down
Laken Riley’s Legacy on the Ballot — Collins Authored the Law, Ossoff Voted...
'Defaced with a Bible Passage’ — Sen. Wiener Melts Down Over Giants Writing...
New TDS Achievement UNLOCKED! Pro-Algae Demonstrators Arrive at the DC Reflecting Pool
Ratio Machine Elizabeth Warren Rake Stomps While Pitching All the 'Free' Stuff a...
LGBTQ ... WTAF? Annapolis Cares About Emergency Preparedness, But Only for SOME of...
Viral World Cup German Freddy Milkshake-Ducked for Supporting Israeli Hostages
Trump WH Statement Puts the Left's Domestic Terrorist Goon Squads on Notice While...
These Optics While Joe Biden Brags About Efforts to Kill the Oil Industry...
Algerian Fans Declare War on Messi in Allah’s Name — He Answers with...
Trump Forces Thune's Hand: Leadership Challenged Over SAVE Act?
FAFO: Judge Hannah Dugan’s Felony Conviction for Shielding Illegal Immigrant from ICE Offi...
Here's a Poll About Flying the American Flag on the 4th of July...
Doctor Who’s 'Been Everywhere' Declares American Groceries Trash, Gets Schooled on Cool AC...
Do Nothing Ivy League PhD, Broke in NYC, Hates Jews: The Perfect Democrat...

Federal Appeals Court Finds Trump’s Transgender Military Ban Unconstitutional, Based Upon Animus

AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein

Happy Pride Month, everyone! Settle in for the next 30 days and be thankful it's not 31.

As we reported last month, a judge threw out the human trafficking case against Maryland man Kilmar Abrego Garcia, claiming that it was "vindictive prosecution" by the Trump administration after being embarrassed by having to bring Abrego Garcia back to the U.S. from El Salvador, his home country. Now, in a 2-1 ruling, a three-judge panel has found that the Trump administration's policy banning transgender individuals from serving in the military is unconstitutional, with one judge writing that it appeared to be driven by "the bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group."

Advertisement

The post continues:

… upon animus, and for those reasons the Policy violates Plaintiff-Appellees' constitutional right to equal protection of the law."

ABC News added that Judge Roger Wilkins wrote that the ban "appears to be driven by the bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group" and that "the decision only applies to the service members who sued the administration and does not bar the Pentagon from blocking transgender people from joining the military."

Advertisement
Advertisement

No, but you can't disqualify people from "politically unpopular groups." You can disqualify them for hundreds of other reasons, but not that one.

***

Editor's Note: Unelected federal judges are hijacking President Trump's agenda and insulting the will of the people.

Help us expose out-of-control judges dead set on halting President Trump's mandate for change. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement