Fauci Takes the Fifth 111 Times While Tillis and Cornyn Betray Trump
Kamala Harris Shares the Dem Party’s Anti-American Agenda As Rumors of Another White...
Bill Maher Ends Anti-Communist Rant by Saying He’d Vote for Sarah Palin Over...
WI DSA Gov Hopeful Francesca Hong Tells Fox News She’s Against Abolishing Senate…...
Trump Gave Thune One Last Chance. He Wasted It.
Republicans, the Florida Governor’s Mansion Isn’t Eighth-Grade Student Council
America's 250th Anniversary Is More Than Just One Single Day
James Carville Lashes Out at the 'Progressive Left' Frankenstein’s Monster His Dem Party...
DNC Deputy Director Scott Brown Strokes His Cat While Explaining the DNC Is...
PLEASE Put Out the Fire! Drunk Republican Revisits Billy Joel to Laugh at...
Schumer, Pelosi Back-Stabbed by Hunter Biden As Dem Coalition Collapses
Bought Blessing: How Abdul El-Sayed Quietly Paid $75,000 for a Detroit Pastor’s Endorsemen...
WH Posts Unreal Photos From Spain Due to Open Borders Insanity (Wait, This...
Comrade Mamdani’s DSA Just Pledged to 'Defend' Chinese Socialism — Peak Democrat Energy
'Dems Deliver' Account Celebrates NY Bill That Would Only Deliver Higher Prices at...

Ketanji Brown Jackson assuages skeptics' concerns with reminder that 'free speech is supposed to be allowed to happen' [video]

If you’re just joining us, it’s Day 3 of the Senate confirmation hearings for Joe Biden’s Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Jackson Brown. She’s fielded a lot of questions so far, but, to be fair, not every single question has been super relevant to the situation. Some issues won’t really factor into things if she gets a seat on the Supreme Court.

Advertisement

But when it comes to stuff like, say, the First Amendment and freedom of speech … well, those seem like topics that you’d definitely want to be brought up during a confirmation hearing for a potential Supreme Court Justice.

And those topics did come up. Unfortunately, Ketanji Brown Jackson’s take on them doesn’t really inspire a whole lot of confidence in her ability to apply the Constitution in interpreting the law:

Her words:

“If there is speech that is an incitement to violence, that’s one circumstance in which the government might be able to prevent it. But, other than that, short of that, um, free speech is supposed to be allowed to happen.”

We get where she’s coming from when it comes to incitement to violence (assuming that she’s talking about actual incitement to violence as opposed to, say, pointing out that a biological male is not a woman. But what’s this “free speech is supposed to be allowed to happen” business? Let’s take another look at the First Amendment, in case we just missed that part somehow:

Advertisement

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Hmmm. “Congress shall make no law […] abridging the freedom of speech.” Seems pretty cut and dried. Nothing about how Congress is not supposed to make any law abridging the freedom of speech.

Yeah, seems like we’re pretty much at that point.

***

Related:

Ketanji Brown Jackson unable to define ‘woman’ because she’s not a biologist (maybe Biden could help)

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement