Randi Weingarten Being Harassed by Congress for Using Teachers' Dues to Promote Her...
FBI Calls MS NOW's Scoop on Kash Patel Being Called to the White...
Shattering the Irony Meter: Ellen Page Rants Against 'Vile Losers' Who Can't Accept...
Try Listening to Tim Walz's Argument Against Deporting a Child Rapist He Pardoned...
For Jim Acosta, Questioning Election Results Is Only 'the Big Lie' If a...
Zohran's Got Some 'Splainin' to Do: Mamdani Admin Gets Caught Setting Up Meetings...
Ratio Alert! Dem Rep. Jayapal Has Seen Enough of This Lawless Behavior (From...
DEMS IN CRISIS: Maine Senate Shake-Up Fuels Midterm Battle for America's Future
'What a Joke'! Look What the Calif. Secretary of State JUST NOW Certified
The White House Getting Security Upgrades Is All the TDS Crowd Needs to...
Jake Tapper Slathers Himself In Shame by Entertaining Rosie O'Donnell's Frothy-Mouthed Mad...
Graham Platner's Withdrawal Statement Is as Dignified as He Always Was (i.e., NOT...
‘Minnesota Man’: Guardian US Headline About Illegal Alien Child Rapist Is a Combo...
Skin Grifting: Texas Democrat Jolanda Jones Says James Talarico Needs to Pay Blacks...
Radial Ratio: Texas Dem’s Tired Idea of ICE Agent Self-Defense Against Moving Vehicles...

Ketanji Brown Jackson assuages skeptics' concerns with reminder that 'free speech is supposed to be allowed to happen' [video]

If you’re just joining us, it’s Day 3 of the Senate confirmation hearings for Joe Biden’s Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Jackson Brown. She’s fielded a lot of questions so far, but, to be fair, not every single question has been super relevant to the situation. Some issues won’t really factor into things if she gets a seat on the Supreme Court.

Advertisement

But when it comes to stuff like, say, the First Amendment and freedom of speech … well, those seem like topics that you’d definitely want to be brought up during a confirmation hearing for a potential Supreme Court Justice.

And those topics did come up. Unfortunately, Ketanji Brown Jackson’s take on them doesn’t really inspire a whole lot of confidence in her ability to apply the Constitution in interpreting the law:

Her words:

“If there is speech that is an incitement to violence, that’s one circumstance in which the government might be able to prevent it. But, other than that, short of that, um, free speech is supposed to be allowed to happen.”

We get where she’s coming from when it comes to incitement to violence (assuming that she’s talking about actual incitement to violence as opposed to, say, pointing out that a biological male is not a woman. But what’s this “free speech is supposed to be allowed to happen” business? Let’s take another look at the First Amendment, in case we just missed that part somehow:

Advertisement

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Hmmm. “Congress shall make no law […] abridging the freedom of speech.” Seems pretty cut and dried. Nothing about how Congress is not supposed to make any law abridging the freedom of speech.

Yeah, seems like we’re pretty much at that point.

***

Related:

Ketanji Brown Jackson unable to define ‘woman’ because she’s not a biologist (maybe Biden could help)

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement