Ana Navarro wants you to 'shut the hell up' if you can't condemn Andrew Cuomo 'full stop' without bringing Donald Trump into the discussion

Sarah D | 2:31 PM on August 03, 2021

Credit where it’s due: Ana Navarro went out on a limb today and unequivocally condemned Andrew Cuomo’s alleged habit sexual harassment.

Well, she condemned it, at least. Unequivocally … not so much:

I find results of Cuomo investigation inexcusable and unacceptable. Full stop.

But, if you support a former President who’s been accused of rape and sexual assault by dozens of women, a man we all heard boast about grabbing a woman by the pussy…

Shut the hell up. Really.

— Ana Navarro-Cárdenas (@ananavarro) August 3, 2021

Ah, she almost had it!

pic.twitter.com/kxo4VGk9lC

— Siraj Hashmi (@SirajAHashmi) August 3, 2021

Does Ana Navarro actually know what “full stop” means?

“Full stop.” “Imma keep goin’…” 🤔 https://t.co/7mnoeIBfIu

— C.J. SoCal 🌞 (@CJayMahoney) August 3, 2021

There doesn’t always need to be a “but,” Ana.

Always a big but… https://t.co/J1O5FtHTSs

— Melissa Mackenzie (@MelissaTweets) August 3, 2021

You said But after a full stop huh.. https://t.co/z55Qiu09M5

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) August 3, 2021

You can't follow "full stop" with "but." That's not how the phrase works.

The issue is not just semantic. It's almost a kind of meta-syntactical gesture. With respect to a line of thought you are (1) halting it and (2) doing so completely. You can't then extend it. https://t.co/NQgPcyk3UL

— Omri Ceren (@omriceren) August 3, 2021

Well, to be fair, CNN personalities (with some notable exceptions) often live by a different set of rules than the rest of us do.