CNN: Plenty of Crying and Hugging in Justice Dept. Hallways After Trump's Gaetz...
Chip Roy OWNS Elizabeth Warren for Shrieking About RFK Jr. with ACTUAL Gov...
SHADY AF! Megyn Kelly Takes Oprah's Explanation About the Million Kamala Paid Her...
The MSM/White House Press Secretary Revolving Door Wasn't a Journalistic Ethics Problem Un...
Clean Up, Aisle CNN! WATCH Hack COMPLETELY Lose His Cool Debating Scott Jennings...
Adam Schiff ... REALLY?! Deep State Democrats Openly Organizing Their Own Shadow Governmen...
Wait, We've HEARD This One Before! CBS News Swings at Pete Hegseth and...
Drew Holden Drops MOTHER of All Truth Bomb RECEIPTS on Ana Navarro for...
Lisa Boothe Drops Truth About What Actress Eva Longoria REALLY Fled (Spoiler: NOT...
Another Stunning Woman Declares a Sex Strike Due to Trump's Win ... and...
Drunk Nancy Then and Now: Side-By-Side Video Show's Pelosi's Gaslighting the Democrat 'Pri...
OH, SHUT UP: Joe Walsh Goes to BBC to Encourage America's Allies to...
Scientific American Editor in Chief, Laura Helmuth Resigns - Science Saved
Here Are a Couple of Really Unfortunate Anti-Trump Tattoos
CNN Digs Up Bill Kristol’s Endorsement Video for Pete Hegseth

'Incompetence of the highest order': CDC appears to have chosen a dubious source to help justify their mask guidance [screenshots]; UPDATE: It gets worse

The last thing the CDC needs right now is another stake through the heart of their credibility.

Sucks to be them, then:

Advertisement

Ah, OK. So the one prompting the call for renewed mask mandates.

The CDC’s brief on “COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccinations” cites a paper, “SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 Delta variant emergence and vaccine breakthrough.” Sounds like it might be relevant to the current discussion on the Delta variant, until you take a look at what the CDC wrote:

“Vaccines not authorized for use in the United States” would certainly suggest that, yes.

Advertisement

Here’s the disclaimer at the top of the paper corresponding to citation number 96 in the CDC’s brief:

“Under consideration at Nature”? “Has not completed peer review at a journal”? And the CDC is citing it in a “Science Brief”?

This is fine.

Totally fine.

Advertisement

Incompetence is the CDC’s brand.

***

Update:

Hey, CDC … you guys have got some major explaining to do:

What the hell?

Clearly there is not.

And salt the earth.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos