Federal Appeals Court Finds Trump’s Transgender Military Ban Unconstitutional, Based Upon...
Bulwark Founder FANGIRLS Over 'Brand New to Politics' Graham Platner Who She Claims...
Jon Ossoff Just Admitted How OBSESSED He Is With Trump (and That He...
Turns Out Robo-Talarico's 'Bot Problem Goes WAY Deeper Than Just 2 Clips' (Is...
BRUTAL Post Sums Up Graham Platner Campaign's Three-Act Farce: Threaten, Lie, Then Lie...
Standing by Maine KAMPF! Jessica Tarlov's BUT TRUMP Defense of Graham Platner Goes...
REVOLTING: Megyn Kelly Didn't Just Let Her Mask Slip on Israel; She Pulled...
SF Chronicle Gets Community Note Nuked Over 'Open Hostility to Gay Rights' in...
Byron York SHUTS George Conway's BRAG of Helping E. Jean Carroll Sue Trump...
How DARE They?! Jill Biden Melts DOWN When NBC Finally Pushes Back on...
WOOF: DEEP-DIVE Into Graham Platner’s Handler, Morris Katz, Explains SO MUCH & Ain't...
Graham Platner and Staff Were Eager to Take Questions After This Campaign Event...
Cenk Uygur and Hasan Piker BODIED After Blaming Israel for UK Ban (Real...
DHS Reality Checks and Wrecks Hakeem Jeffries Over an ICE Detention Center and...
Monday Morning Meme Madness

Make Censorship Great Again? Tech journo takes to the New York Times to call for Twitter to 'cleanse the Trump stain'

Donald Trump’s tweets about Joe Scarborough’s dead intern are inappropriate at best. Seriously, they’re gross.

The thing is, Donald Trump is entitled to tweet vile things. That’s kind of how things work in this country.

Advertisement

So it’s pretty disheartening to see a journalist like Kara Swisher calling for a clampdown on Trump’s free speech in the New York Times:

Aside from the moral preening? We’re really not sure.

Swisher writes:

While the always thoughtful Mr. [Jack] Dorsey has said previously that he has to hew to Twitter’s principles and rules, and that the company cannot spend all of its time reacting, its approach up until now results only in Twitter’s governance getting gamed by players like Mr. Trump, in ways that are both shameless and totally expected.

So why not be unexpected with those who continue to abuse the system? Taking really valuable one-off actions can be laudable since they make an example of someone’s horrid behavior as a warning to others. While it is impossible to stop the endless distribution of a screenshot of the tweets, taking the original ones down would send a strong message that this behavior is not tolerated.

Advertisement

Or, if he must, Mr. Dorsey could set up an independent content board as Facebook has recently done, which could take on thorny questions like this and remove them from his purview. This might seem like a cop-out, but putting these questions up for a more measured debate might be the exit that the company needs to focus on the rest of its business.

Here’s the thing: Donald Trump tweets a lot of garbage. But you know what? Do do a lot of other people. We’ve documented plenty of liberal tweeters who have used Twitter to peddle disgusting things and fake news of their own. Yet we don’t recall Swisher or the New York Times calling for them to be censored.

In fact, Swisher herself has used her Twitter account to indulge unfounded conspiracy theories about Republicans:

Advertisement

Swisher’s piece seems less like a plea for decency and more like a plea for Trump to be punished. What could possibly go wrong?

***

Related:

Twitter will not remove President Trump’s tweets on Joe Scarborough and the death of Lori Klausutis

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement