Do you have your shocked faces handy? Better make sure, because you’re gonna need ’em for this development in the Elizabeth Warren pregnancy narrative saga:
WATCH: Elizabeth Warren's 2011 Claim About Pregnancy Discrimination Appears to Undermine Current Explanation https://t.co/KpV2Bt1yCQ
— Mediaite (@Mediaite) October 10, 2019
Another smear job from right-wing nutjob outlet *squints* …. Mediaite https://t.co/ui1BJN2LNv
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) October 10, 2019
More from Mediaite’s Tommy Christopher:
But in a 2011 interview with Rutgers Law Professor Paul Tractenberg, Warren was comfortable enough to open up about pregnancy discrimination by law firms, and yet recounted her exit from teaching without mentioning it at all. In fact, she corroborated details of her 2007 account, like the reason for her decision to go into law.
“I was married at 19 to a boy I had dated since my freshman year in high school,” Warren said. “I had a baby, he was transferred to New Jersey, I was going to be a public school teacher and, a whole series of quick events, and I had been a high school debater, and the boys in high school debate back in Oklahoma had said ‘You should think about law school.’”
“And so I read up, found out there was a law school in Newark, drove in, looked around and thought ‘I could give it a try.’”
Later in that same interview, Warren told Tractenberg “I graduated from law school 9 months pregnant, and Amy’s getting a little bigger at that point, and I thought I’d stepped off the train. You know, hard enough to get a job for a woman then, I was about to have a baby and nobody was interested in me. And with that law degree from Rutgers, I hung out a shingle.”
Recommended
Watch the interview:
Huh.
Is this the part where we start pouncing?
— Mike (@BurghFinsFan) October 10, 2019
Ima bout to pounce all over this shit.
— Dominus (@Your_Dominus) October 10, 2019
Now seems like as good a time as any.
This story broke days ago and the press has been desperately trying to get it to go away and avoid reporting it….https://t.co/fBZX0y0RHT
— EducatëdHillbilly™ (@RobProvince) October 10, 2019
But uh I was told by @washingtonpost that what she said was absolutely true because Republicans and stuff. What happened @GlennKesslerWP? Democracy is dying! https://t.co/sXrBKDmUz4
— eric (@eriContrarian) October 10, 2019
I am absolutely SHOCKED Elizabeth Warren is a FRAUD.
WATCH: Elizabeth Warren's 2011 Claim About Pregnancy Discrimination Appears to Undermine Current Explanation https://t.co/kAkfZBcUWW via @mediaite
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) October 10, 2019
Ok people, you must ignore this video, the 2007 video, and the county record. Instead you really need to look at all of the anecdotal evidence that the press has complied from people who aren't actually Elizabeth Warren. THEY HAVE THE RECEIPTS!
— Regs (@r3gulations) October 10, 2019
Sorry but you have to excuse her own words in this video and the video in 2007 because our media and brave journalists said that it feels true that she was discriminated against https://t.co/4djwRIsNga
— ? Bob “Spooky ghost of Bin Laden” Malak ? (@bob_malak) October 10, 2019
Join the conversation as a VIP Member