Meghan McCain Challenges Democrats to Define a Woman Igniting a Political Firestorm
I'm Worried About the Election, but So Are Kamala Harris' Supporters
Dueling Pollsters Show Nevada As A Toss-Up or Leaning Trump. No Wonder...
Right on Time 'The Atlantic' (Owned by Kamala's Dear Friend) Claims Trump Causes...
Nothing Is Making Van Jones Feel Happy About Pennsylvania
Election Day SALE: 60% Off VIP Membership
Rep. Rashida Tlaib: Israel Bombed Children Waiting for Polio Vaccine
Abortion and COVID Obsessed Doctor Wonders How the Election is Even Close
Even Our Dogs Know: A Vote for Trump Is a Vote For America...
Arizona -- What All the Data Shows With Less Than 24 Hours to...
American Hero Perishes in Controversial Biden/Harris Authorized Gaza Pier Mission
BREAKING: Huge News as Joe Rogan Officially Endorses Donald Trump
JD Vance Demonstrates Shrinkflation Under Biden-Harris
Former Obama Spokesman Sad That Megyn Kelly Fell for Russian Disinformation About Doug...
New York Times Thinks Biden's Legacy Will Be His Success in Lowering Border...

'Creative judicial nonsense'! Connecticut Supreme Court rules that Remington can be sued for Sandy Hook shooting

Farewell, personal responsibility. You had a good run:

Advertisement

Did the Connecticut Supreme Court consult with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for this case?

Unless of course, the goal is to punish gun manufacturers.

The latter. Definitely the latter.

Advertisement

More:

Justices issued a 4-3 decision that reinstated a wrongful death lawsuit and overturned a lower court ruling that the lawsuit was prohibited by a 2005 federal law that shields gun manufacturers from liability in most cases when their products are used in crimes.

The plaintiffs include a survivor and relatives of nine people killed in the massacre. They argue the AR-15-style rifle used by shooter Adam Lanza is too dangerous for the public and Remington glorified the weapon in marketing it to young people.

Remington has denied wrongdoing and previously insisted it can’t be sued under the federal law.

The majority of the high court agreed with most of the lower court’s ruling and dismissed most of the lawsuit’s allegations, but allowed a wrongful marketing claim to proceed.

“The regulation of advertising that threatens the public’s health, safety, and morals has long been considered a core exercise of the states’ police powers,” Justice Richard Palmer wrote for the majority.

OK, now that we’ve read that … the decision is most definitely still stupid.

Advertisement

Yeah, well, something tells us this case isn’t closed just yet.

We sincerely hope so.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement