'GO GET 'EM'! Dana Loesch deftly turns the sexism table on Media Matters

Another day, another Media Matters beef with Dana Loesch.

So, what’d she do this time? Well, she had the chutzpah to call Chelsea Manning by her given name and to suggest that Manning is not, in fact, a woman. Or, as Media Matters frames it, an “anti-trans attack”:

NRA launches anti-trans attacks against Chelsea Manning: https://t.co/AAZGG13Zo7 pic.twitter.com/mXO6BwJDwy

— Media Matters (@mmfa) January 16, 2018

Hmmm.

https://twitter.com/_thymes/status/953335965057212417

@NRA These are not anti-trans attacks; they are anti-felon attacks. Why is it @mmfa and other libs consider every opinion to be either racist or anti-gay? Fools!

— croatian heart (@croatianheart) January 16, 2018

Fools is right. Bring a knife to a gun fight with Dana Loesch and you’re bound to get hurt:

Oh no I’m being mansplained to by a mostly male Soros outlet mad that they can’t force me to accept a patriarchal appropriation of my female gender. I simply said having breasts and red lips doesn’t make you a woman. ¯_( ツ)_/¯ https://t.co/TmwJD0nLfS

— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) January 16, 2018

As a strong woman, is Loesch not entitled to her very valid opinion?

Well said.

— Jack Canady (@jack_canady) January 16, 2018

Recommended

No Need to Hire a Comedian When AP ‘Journalist’ Unintentionally Provides Biggest Laugh at WHCD

Warren Squire

Advertisement

She had more to say:

If you think that makeup and physical attributes are all it takes to make one a woman, how are you not sexist? Also, thank you for taking the bait so I can make this a larger discussion.

— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) January 16, 2018

Great question!

Go get ‘em! ?

— Chief Wolfhound (@DeMelaatse) January 16, 2018

Go get em Dana! ???

— ❌Kathi (@kattalang) January 16, 2018

Amen Dana. Amen.

— Christy (@sissy1287) January 16, 2018

https://twitter.com/THEDOGPOUND1/status/953336189926309889

Boom, indeed.

Could they be anymore predictable?

— Just June ? (@MissJitter) January 16, 2018

Nope.