You guys remember Susanna Gibson, yes? She's a Democrat running for office in Virginia ... she also was discovered to have performed various sex acts online for money. Sorry, for 'tips.'
Actually, tokens, because that somehow makes this all better for some reason EVEN THOUGH the tokens were basically just another way to take money BUT we digress.
Welp, seems the VA Republican Party has seen fit to use Gibson's 'work' on flyers as the state nears the very important 2023 election for the House and Senate ... and Lefties are discombobulated about it.
They're not complaining at Gibson for having something in her past that could so easily be used by the opposition party, no no, they're mad at the opposition party for trying to win an election.
Even this sad little attorney thinks they're somehow violating Virginia's revenge porn law.
No, really.
pretty hard to see how this doesn't violate Virginia's (quite strong) revenge porn law https://t.co/h4RL4MqZ4c pic.twitter.com/WJ8guGVgWv
— Joshua Erlich (@JoshuaErlich) October 24, 2023
Except you know, she put that content out for the public who bought tokens to look at it.
Andrew Follett chimed in:
Your law degree should be revoked for being this much of an illiterate simp.
— Andrew Follett (@AndrewCFollett) October 24, 2023
She herself posted the videos publicly on the Internet while a candidate for office. https://t.co/TVya6UbFPD
Oopsie.
The so-called attorney shot back:
pretty unclear what "she posted the videos herself" has to do with revenge porn but go off buddy https://t.co/9hxZQuoweq
— Joshua Erlich (@JoshuaErlich) October 24, 2023
If she posted them there is no revenge here, unless of course she is seeking revenge on herself?
Which seems weird but you do you, bro.
Aren't lawyers supposed to be literate? Cause you clearly aren't.
— Andrew Follett (@AndrewCFollett) October 24, 2023
Gibson posted the videos to a porn site and was paid for them.
She doesn't own them...no matter how much you lie otherwise.https://t.co/sbuCgXhIsu
Maybe she's seeking revenge on the porn site!
HA HA HA HA HA
Sorry, we can't even at this point.
law doesn't say anything about ownership. you should read it again. carefully. slowly. maybe with help.
— Joshua Erlich (@JoshuaErlich) October 24, 2023
Awww, look at how hard he's trying.
We almost feel sorry for him.
Almost.
It takes actual effort to be as dishonest as @JoshuaErlich ... https://t.co/QnbbjoXkGk pic.twitter.com/eIWFSrh9KU
— Andrew Follett (@AndrewCFollett) October 24, 2023
Seriously.
if you read Chaturbate terms of service you'd know those videos are public domain from the moment she streamed them
— The Virginia Project (@ProjectVirginia) October 24, 2023
Self-described "civil rights lawyer" unfamiliar with the First Amendment.
— beans (@beantropy) October 24, 2023
Not exactly the sort of argument we'd put out there if we were looking to impress but hey, what do we know?
***
Related:
'They Are NOT Freedom Fighters': Brutal Thread Explains Who and What Hamas REALLY Is
KJP Asked if Biden is Worried about Rise in Anti-Semitism and Her Answer is Just So DAMNING (Watch)
***
Editor's Note: Hi there. I know it's been some time since we changed this up but changing it up now to see if any of you read this far. How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? ALSO, if you are reading this far please sign up for Twitchy VIP and help us continue bringing you the truth, especially the truth Biden and his Big Tech goons don't want us sharing.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member