Graham Platner's Withdrawal Statement Is as Dignified as He Always Was (i.e., NOT...
‘Minnesota Man’: Guardian US Headline About Illegal Alien Child Rapist Is a Combo...
Skin Grifting: Texas Democrat Jolanda Jones Says James Talarico Needs to Pay Blacks...
Radial Ratio: Texas Dem’s Tired Idea of ICE Agent Self-Defense Against Moving Vehicles...
Marco Rubio Blocks Tim Walz's Illegal Pardon, Newsom Froze Like Deer In Headlights
Sayonara, Sex Offender: Marco Rubio Reminds Tim Walz What Protecting Americans Looks Like
Orca Orchestrations: Hollywood’s ‘Reimagining’ of ‘Free Willy’ Has Movie Fans Wailing with...
Scott Jennings Just Needs 1 Post to Shut Conspiracy Nuts Attacking America/Israel's Allian...
Hakeem Jeffries Is Getting Help Deciphering What His Opposition to the SAVE Act...
Gavin Newsom Is a Lying Sack of SNOT. In Other News, Water Is...
She's Gonna BLOW! Ana Navarro Completely UNRAVELS When Asked to Name 1 American...
Rep. Ilhan Omar Was Eager to Answer Questions About Huge Financial Disclosure Revisions...
Oh, HONEY: X Points and LAUGHS As Maine Dems Pretend They're SUPER DUPER...
Bats**t ISN'T a Good Look? Who Knew? Megyn Kelly Suddenly Calling Out Kirk...
Maine Senate Hopeful Troy Jackson Is Trying the 'Man's Man' Approach and it's...

FUME: Twitter insisting Lila Rose and Live Action remove this content to lift the BAN on their ads will INFURIATE you

Remember when Jack Dorsey told everyone (even Congress!) there is no political bias on his website?

Good times.

Granted, we all knew he was full of crap when he made the claim but still. Otherwise, why would Twitter be banning ads from pro-life accounts like Lila Rose and Live Action?

Advertisement

So basically, any content that tells the truth about the horrors of abortion must be removed from their site and Twitter feeds for the ban to be lifted.

What a crock.

From USAToday:

Twitter’s reasoning for blocking Live Action’s message? In emails to us, the company has said that our content violated its sensitive advertising content policy, which prohibits “inflammatory or provocative content which is likely to evoke a strong negative reaction.”

Some examples of this supposedly offensive content include pictures of children developing in the womb and even simple ultrasound images of babies — like the ones that expectant parents hang on their refrigerator doors.

Twitter’s actions suggest it’s OK for Planned Parenthood to tweet that a woman has a right to an abortion, but when I tweet and try to promote that a baby has a right to life, Twitter considers that inflammatory.

Twitter’s actions suggest it’s fine for Planned Parenthood to tweet that taxpayers who don’t want to fund the nation’s largest abortion chain are “extremists,” but when I tweet that there are alternative options to Planned Parenthood, Twitter calls that an offensive violation of policy.

Advertisement

Notice they’re not censoring the harpies pushing abortion up to and including birth.

Oof.

How dare Lila and her organization tell the truth about abortion.

‘Nuff said.


Related:

Beep, beep, BEEEEP: Steven Crowder apologizes for using certain ‘words’ on his show and Vox’s Carlos Maza MELTS DOWN

‘We’re REALLY doing this’?! Dan Crenshaw NAILS House Dems for playing dishonest politics in voting to hold Barr in contempt

Somebody’s NERVOUS: Eric Holder sure seems anxious to get Trump impeached sooner than later, wonder why

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement