Welp, if you needed another reason to point and laugh at ‘The Bulwark,’ here ya’ go.
lol, have these paste-eaters been listening to Democrat’s recently? pic.twitter.com/JdtHbmB0rc
— John Ekdahl (@JohnEkdahl) March 22, 2019
At the end of the day, it’s their site and their choice as to what they publish for their readers. Truth be told we probably wouldn’t even pay attention to what they’re writing except for the fact they insist they are conserving conservatism.
Or they were, did they change their header?
Slightly dangerous. K.
Venezuelans were starving too much to provide comment.
— Bethany S. Mandel (@bethanyshondark) March 22, 2019
No, they found a British dude. Beyond damn parody.
— Kaitlin with the Good Hair (@thefactualprep) March 22, 2019
British dude.
Hrm.
Conservatism has truly been conserved; to the point that we must now concentrate and consecrate the conservation of the antithetical ideas of the con.
— Henry Rearden (@StrikeoftheMind) March 22, 2019
so are they trying to be vox right or what
— marilyn maupin (@marilynmaupin) March 22, 2019
Except for that to work they’d have to actually support the Right.
How does this conserve conservatism again?
— Sea Salt Enthusiast (@EnthusiastSea) March 22, 2019
Recommended
ORANGE MAN BAD, that’s how.
::blink::
::blink::
::blink::If this is what slightly dangerous conserving conservatism looks like, I want no part of it. I guess the grift DOES pay well.
— Physics Geek (@physicsgeek) March 22, 2019
— Seth Mandel (@SethAMandel) March 22, 2019
Conservative principles like socialism.
Heh.
I wish that article ran under the old slogan. Would have been perfect.
— John Ekdahl (@JohnEkdahl) March 22, 2019
It actually means their current tagline requires a revision.
“Slightly Obtuse” seems appropriate.
— Stacey (@ScotsFyre) March 22, 2019
Wow, "lighten up on socialism" is their actual take in that piece. Was assuming that the Arbiters of True Conservatism were being a bit satirical with that headline, but nope.
— Dan (@LawoftheGator) March 22, 2019
C’mon, lighten up. Socialism has only killed millions of people … psh.
Last year’s news, today!
— Wayne Kimbell (@wayne_kimbell) March 22, 2019
Its never been tried.
— John Commodore Barry (@ShrinkGov) March 22, 2019
Oh, our sides.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA.
Hey,c'mon, a century of failure, murder & starvation proves NOTHING!
— Terry_Jim ? Terry in CB (@Terry_Jim) March 22, 2019
LIGHTEN UP.
Conserving conservatism by explaining how "Socialism ain't so bad."
Legit heirs to Reagan, these guys.— Victor Tango Kilo (@GenghisKhet) March 22, 2019
True dat.
Related:
Join the conversation as a VIP Member