Gosh, it seems like Jonathan Chait wasn’t all that happy with Gordon Sondland’s testimony.
Wonder why that could be?
Gordon Sondland's defense is that he's the dumbest ambassador in the history of diplomacy https://t.co/An2bHeGhet
— Jonathan Chait (@jonathanchait) October 17, 2019
Sheesh, Chait needs a Snickers bar … maybe a bit more fiber in his diet.
I'm sorry this is happening to you, Jonathan.
— See Jack Run (@CrackaJackin) October 17, 2019
Poor lil feller.
Narrator: He didn’t say what we wanted him to.
— Jay K (@JayKlos) October 17, 2019
It didn’t fit his narrative.
So I guess it’s safe to say that Sonlands testimony didn’t give the Democrats what they wanted. They’ve called on their media hounds to attack him.
— Carla Burlando (@CarlaBurlando) October 17, 2019
Well duh. He didn’t push the ‘Trump bad, m’kay’ narrative so they’re going to try and discredit him so he can’t be used to debunk their silly ‘witch hunt’.
Brit Hume saw right through his tweet.
Such attacks are how you can tell that Sondland’s statement did not advance the case for impeachment. https://t.co/mgQGfkr9Uz
— Brit Hume (@brithume) October 17, 2019
Brit dropped him … so politely.
and then (see Bloomberg) they just make stuff up, conflating 2016 with 2020
— Sandy 〽️ (@RightGlockMom) October 17, 2019
None other then Adam Schiff’s “parody” has.
— Tennessee Jed (@TennesseeJed10) October 17, 2019
Pretty much how the Left characterizes anyone who doesn't support their narrative. Stupid. And or corrupt. Must be. Cuz the narrative isn't wrong. So anyone who challenges their dogma must be summarily excommunicated.
— Philip Cahalin (@PhilipCahalin) October 17, 2019
Transparency dies in Democracy in the Democrat-run House.
— Brian McKeon (@Bbbmckeon) October 17, 2019
Ain’t that the truth?