Cam Edwards has officially solved the great mystery around why certain reporters have either been blaming Andy Ngo for being attacked by Antifa-thugs in Portland and/or some who are outright LYING about the attack even happening in the first place.
Like Shane Burley who tweeted that Ngo’s attack (even though we saw it on video) was a blatant lie.
Now, why oh why would certain journos be working so hard to contradict a story that puts Antifa in a negative light?
Gosh, I wonder why the pro-Antifa journalist wasn’t attacked by Antifa? It’s a real mystery. pic.twitter.com/HSuZhNHh8l
— Cam Edwards (@CamEdwards) June 30, 2019
Color us shocked … SHOCKED!
Whoda thunk it, right?
Looks like there were more reporters than cops.
— Ken Scoggin (@Mrkensco) June 30, 2019
And in fact, the cops took OFF.
I’m going to have a sleepless night trying to figure that one out.
— Avigdor Loeb (@AvigdorLoeb) June 30, 2019
So many moving pieces, ya’ know?
It's a real conundrum.
— Darth_VValker (@Darth_VValker) July 1, 2019
They think we're dumb
— Fusilli Spock (@awstar11) June 30, 2019
— dfinney (@dfinney16) June 30, 2019
And they’d be wrong on both counts.
Really makes you think
— Louis Vil Le SquirtGun (@LouisvilleGun) June 30, 2019
So much THINKING.
Unless you’re an Antifa-supporting journo and then not so much thinking.