Note, if you’re supposedly a Conservative and David Frum is pushing your work you’re doing it wrong.
Read this thread. https://t.co/6smhXtmjPA
— David Frum (@davidfrum) March 21, 2019
Ok, fine, since Frum said so (and since we can hardly ever pass up an opportunity to shine the spotlight on ‘The Bulwark’). We read it so you don’t have to. YOU’RE WELCOME.
Well, you have to read it, but just a little bit. Take a look at this …
— Christian Vanderbrouk (@UrbanAchievr) March 21, 2019
Vanderbrouk has a HUGE thread about his piece (which is really just him parroting the piece on the site from what we could follow), but we just couldn’t bear to punish our readers with it. Plus he’s blocked the majority of us here at Twitchy and writing about him is a pain. True story.
Sidenote. If we start using words like ‘quixotic’ to try and sound superior to our readers please throw something at our heads. Thx!
And sure, go ahead, pick a fight with Kurt Schlichter, let us know how that works out for you.
The best part of the Bulwark gimps trying desperately to get attention for their failing blog by lying about me is how it's getting three kinds of responses:
1. Mockery by conservatives
2. RTs by carbby Bluwark dorks
3. Likes by lib bots
— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) March 21, 2019
And LOTS of mockery by conservatives.
Vanderbrouk also goes after Jesse Kelly in the piece but it appears he only shared tweets from Schlichter.
— \Select all Delete (@SuisunDan) March 21, 2019
Who knew carbby was a thing?
When you start to attack other conservatives, a publication like that is heading towards failure.
— cr (@propatriots) March 21, 2019
Doing the same thing over and over again but expecting a different outcome is insanity. Just sayin’.
Bulwark? Oh, you mean, The Fragile Kristol Chandelier.
— Ecklebob Chiselfritz (@RotNScoundrel) March 21, 2019
Hey, at least this time The Bulwark didn’t knowingly send a pro-choice liberal to a conservative conference so she could make fun of a bunch of pro-life people and trash the movement, right?