It seems like Ronan Farrow’s piece on Kavanaugh accuser Deborah Ramirez has people raising their eyebrows, not that the story itself is shocking at this point, but that it was published AT ALL. Forget that the New York Times passed because Ramirez couldn’t find anyone to corroborate her story (they do appear to have removed that line from their piece), but his co-author was Jane Mayer, who just so happens to retweet unverified accounts openly smearing Kavanaugh.

And spreading unvetted accusations about Kavanaugh lying.

But we thought this wasn’t supposed to be political?

Huh.

He seems nice.

Unvetted and unverified.

Like much of these accusations against Kavanaugh.

Color us not shocked.

Right?

Such a strange coincidence.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA, oh, our sides.

UNCLE! UNCLE!

Uh-oh, Jane seems angry:

K?

That doesn’t mean she’s not biased. *shrug*

More tweets from the guy Mayer keeps retweeting.

Sure.

Ain’t he a sweetheart?

Don’t worry guys, they’re just covering the story because they believe women, not because they’re biased hacks pushing a narrative or anything.

*eye roll*


Related:

COMPLICIT AF! NYT edits out KEY piece from their original Deborah Ramirez story without ANY editor’s notes

TOO FAR! Jimmy Kimmel’s ABHORRENT and violent joke about Kavanaugh BITES him right in the a*s

Looks BAD! After spending DAYS bragging about Kavanaugh GOTCHA, Michael Avenatti locks his Twitter account