What the heck, DOJ?
Trump DOJ @TheJusticeDept is still spending your tax $ fighting my computer intrusion lawsuit — instead of helping us find the names of those responsible and prosecuting them.
— Sharyl Attkisson?️♂️ (@SharylAttkisson) May 17, 2018
Is this because there are too many Obama hold-overs still at the DOJ?
We’re thinking it may be.
@realDonaldTrump The DOJ is doing to Sharyl what the DOJ is doing to House Committees. DJT has the power to stop the stonewalling of Sharyl & should pit an end to it. The public & Sharyl need to know who in the prior administration remotely accessed this reporter’s computers.
— Justavoice (@LVFredacs) May 18, 2018
Right you are, person with no avi
You're not wrong about that. https://t.co/k2sjhBOQAu
— Sharyl Attkisson?️♂️ (@SharylAttkisson) May 18, 2018
Whoa, Sharyl agrees with us.
https://twitter.com/Mar2vin/status/997312406220091392
So, in other words, this is BIG.
Bigger than Trump.
Bigger than the election.
But not bigger than Hillary … ba dum bum.
I think there's a major fallacy in focusing on the 2016 election without understanding the bigger part of the picture: *why* bad actors in intel community were so desperate to not have Trump elected. It's about what could be discovered about the past 10-20 years. Not just 2016. https://t.co/5DbziruLJN
— Sharyl Attkisson?️♂️ (@SharylAttkisson) May 18, 2018
What do they not want us to know?
It’s the deep state. I did not believe in it, thought it was a silly conspiracy theory until all of the FBI stuff started coming out.
— Ann ☃️ (@annlanncan) May 18, 2018
It feels funny to write the words, ‘deep state,’ like it’s some sort of bad John Grisham novel, but it seems like an appropriate way to talk about these bad actors in the intel community.
Wonder if that is why you keep getting the run around with your laptop and the DOJ?
— Susan (@smc12256) May 18, 2018
I believe it's all related in the sense that there have been important abuses by some actors in intel community for years. My case is just a symptom. If anyone is successful in peeling that onion –and some are starting to get close — who knows what we will find. https://t.co/x1wJ44CInz
— Sharyl Attkisson?️♂️ (@SharylAttkisson) May 18, 2018
How many layers will we find in this onion?
Just 10-20 years? The CIA has been out of control since the 50's. I guess most of the black hats from those days are dead.
— Deplorable Nationalist Jaime (@james59arizona) May 18, 2018
You make a point. We knew some of what J. Edgar Hoover did. Does anybody think that after that, the bad actors in our intel agencies burned all their blackmail files and changed their infrastructure from top to bottom? Or that there's more of it now and we just don't know? https://t.co/sTkcbqSo4e
— Sharyl Attkisson?️♂️ (@SharylAttkisson) May 18, 2018
And that they don’t want us to know.
Related:
WHOA: Sally Kohn accidentally AGREES with the NRA about how best to protect our children
SHAME ON YOU! CNN gets lit the eff UP for posting intentionally dishonest ‘school shooting’ map
Attention HOGG! David Hogg CALLED OUT for making Santa Fe High School shooting about HIMSELF
Join the conversation as a VIP Member