As we told you last night, Max Boot called on the FCC to reintroduce the Fairness Doctrine to “slow the lies and sedition from Fox and other right-wing broadcasters”:
Someone needs to quietly, kindly take Max Boot aside and explain to him that they will never accept him as anything other than an infrequently useful tool–the allen wrench of political punditry–no matter how censorious or neo-authoritarian he gets. pic.twitter.com/8gparfphcF
— Jeff B., who on earth is this guy?? (@EsotericCD) January 19, 2021
Now, we pointed out all the mockery last night but this point-by-point takedown by NR’s Jim Geraghty is well worth a read.
THREAD ==>
Max Boot calling for the FCC to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine to reign in Fox News Channel is what happens when a columnist writes with great passion and doesn’t bother to look up the specifics of what he’s writing about.https://t.co/hVGla6P5TP
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 19, 2021
Recommended
“For starters,” Boot has not idea what he’s even talking about:
For starters, Fox News – and Fox Business News, One America Network, and NewsMax TV — are cable stations and do not broadcast over public airwaves.https://t.co/hVGla6P5TP
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 19, 2021
The Federal Communications Commission has little authority over cable channels. The FCC might have a little more authority over Fox News Sunday and other news programs that carried by the Fox Broadcasting Company.https://t.co/hVGla6P5TP
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 19, 2021
And the FCC got rid of it in 1987 with a bipartisan unanimous vote:
The FCC commissioners decided to revoke the Fairness Doctrine in 1987, a unanimous 4–0 decision involving two Republican commissioners and two Democratic commissioners. https://t.co/hVGla6P5TP
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 19, 2021
The FCC counsel concluded that the rule had become counterproductive, as broadcasters “had shied away from covering controversial issues in news, documentaries and editorial advertisements.”https://t.co/hVGla6P5TP
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 19, 2021
This was considered good news at the time:
After the decision, Floyd Abrams, a lawyer who specializes in First Amendment cases, told the New York Times, “This is the beginning of the end of Governmental control over the content of what appears on television.”https://t.co/hVGla6P5TP
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 19, 2021
But here we are:
In short, Boot wants to _reinstate_ government control over the content of what appears on television.https://t.co/hVGla6P5TP pic.twitter.com/jsP1JIFI8B
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 19, 2021
Again, the FD applied to broadcast networks because they used the public spectrum to get their signal from their station or broadcast tower to your antennae. Cable and satellite-television providers didn’t use public airwaves, so the FCC had less authority to regulate them.
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 19, 2021
Cable news existed at the time — CNN was founded in 1980 — but no one paid much attention to that network until Baby Jessica fell down the well.https://t.co/hVGla6P5TP pic.twitter.com/UIcsPgg9Ns
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 19, 2021
In the agency’s own words, “the FCC’s authority to respond to these complaints [of bias, inaccuracy, or poor coverage] is narrow in scope & the agency is prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing on First Amendment rights of the press.” https://t.co/hVGla6P5TP
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 19, 2021
"Expressions of views that do not involve a 'clear and present danger of serious, substantive evil' come under the protection of the Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of the press and prevents suppression of these expressions by the FCC."
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 19, 2021
That phrase “clear and present danger of serious, substantive evil” comes from the Supreme Court case Terminiello v. City of Chicago… https://t.co/hVGla6P5TP
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 19, 2021
… which held that a city ordinance banning speech that “stirs the public to anger, invites dispute, brings about a condition of unrest, or creates a disturbance” was unconstitutional under the First and 14th Amendments.https://t.co/hVGla6P5TP
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 19, 2021
Take a moment to read Justice William Douglas, writing for the majority:https://t.co/hVGla6P5TP pic.twitter.com/NETsEymjAL
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 19, 2021
Then again, “standardization of ideas by legislatures, courts, or dominant political or community groups” might be precisely what some people aim to achieve.https://t.co/hVGla6P5TP
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 19, 2021
Biden can “reinvigorate” the FCC all he or Boot likes, but the federal agency is not going to have the authority to start telling cable channels what they can and can’t say…https://t.co/hVGla6P5TP
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 19, 2021
…unless – deviating from the Morning Jolt text here – they want 5 to 9 Supreme Court justices kicking their keister up and down the bench in the near future, for egregiously violating the First Amendment.
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 19, 2021
***
