Wailing at Walz: Leftist Mob Amasses at Minnesota Governor’s Mansion to Demand ‘Legalizati...
Dem Dick Durbin Was Against Using the DOJ to Prosecute Political Enemies Until...
‘Temporary’ Insanity: AOC Can’t Accept That TPS Status Has an Expiration Date and...
Max Tani Cries Fowl At Critics To Point Out Washington Post's Birdpoop Articles,...
Dems Go for Gold in BS: JD Vance 'Booed Relentlessly' at Olympic Opening...
People Have Questions About This Local Media Description of the Weapon Carried by...
Cue the Outrage! Lefties Blow a Gasket at Trump for 'Racist' Meme (Except...
It's Only February but Rep. Jamie Raskin Just Made 'the Dumbest Argument of...
WATCH: Jews and Allies Drag Tone-Deaf Superbowl Advertisement Against Anti-Semitism
Reid Hoffman's Terrible, Horrible, No-Good, VERY BAD Epstein's Files Release Just Keeps Ge...
Jamie Raskin Starts Panicking During Hysterical SAVE Act Meltdown
'Very Revealing'! One Short Word in AOC's WaPo Layoffs Take Gives Away How...
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Showed Her TRUE Colors at The Grammys
GRRL, No! LOL! Kamala Harris Tries to QUIETLY Make BIG Change to Her...
Here's Brian Stelter on WaPo's Woes vs. X's Potential Demise (One of These...

Official licensed NFL mask: 'This face covering is not intended to prevent or protect from any form of illness or disease (or otherwise)'

The NFL will reportedly require all fans to wear masks if/when games resume this fall:

Advertisement

How exactly are they going to enforce this?

Who needs to go to games anyway:

It this kind of mask okay?

We only ask because officially licensed masks, like this one, don’t sound much better: “This face covering is not intended to prevent or protect from any form of illness or disease (or otherwise)”:

Here’s the warning they give:

As for the effectiveness of cloth masks like this, the jury is still out. But the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy nows says they’re “better than doing nothing”:

The authors and CIDRAP have received requests in recent weeks to remove this article from the CIDRAP website. Reasons have included: (1) we don’t truly know that cloth masks (face coverings) are not effective, since the data are so limited, (2) wearing a cloth mask or face covering is better than doing nothing, (3) the article is being used by individuals and groups to support non-mask wearing where mandated and (4) there are now many modeling studies suggesting that cloth masks or face coverings could be effective at flattening the curve and preventing many cases of infection.

Advertisement

You know, maybe we’re putting too much faith in masks to stop this thing? Just a thought:

Also, it appears this mask requirement doesn’t apply equally:

Of course not.

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos