Chip Roy Sums Up CNN-Style 'Journalism' After Natalie Harp Sensationalism Backfires
The Memo (or Fatwa) Went Out: Michigan Dems Bend the Knee in Unison...
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott Has a Demand of His Own After MN AG...
Oh, Brother!: CNN’s Erin Burnett Questions Sibling of Natalie Harp to Prolong Scandal...
Don Lemon and Jemele Hill Say Stephen A. Smith Is ‘Problematic’ for Hosting...
Briahna Joy Gray and the Luigi Mangione Murder Apologists
Trump Gloats As Alexander Vindman Suffers Upset Loss to DSA Member in FL...
That's Not Funny: Amnesty International UK to Host 'Comedy' Event
AG Keith Ellison Sues Texas to Compel the Extradition of an ICE Agent...
Broadcaster Says Racism in the Media Is Responsible for ‘Proffesor’ Jason Arday’s Death
Jake Tapper Questions Framing of an Old Clip of Him Saying a ‘Politburo’...
Iowa Congressional Candidate’s ‘Security’ (He's a Mayor) Knocks Phone Out of Reporter’s Ha...
We Are Coke State: 14 Arrested in Fraternity Run Drug Ring at Penn...
California's Nanny Bureaucrats Make Purchasing Replacement Tires More Expensive
Journo Stops Guest Mid-Interview When He Claims Israel Is Committing Genocide

Official licensed NFL mask: 'This face covering is not intended to prevent or protect from any form of illness or disease (or otherwise)'

The NFL will reportedly require all fans to wear masks if/when games resume this fall:

Advertisement

How exactly are they going to enforce this?

Who needs to go to games anyway:

It this kind of mask okay?

We only ask because officially licensed masks, like this one, don’t sound much better: “This face covering is not intended to prevent or protect from any form of illness or disease (or otherwise)”:

Here’s the warning they give:

As for the effectiveness of cloth masks like this, the jury is still out. But the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy nows says they’re “better than doing nothing”:

The authors and CIDRAP have received requests in recent weeks to remove this article from the CIDRAP website. Reasons have included: (1) we don’t truly know that cloth masks (face coverings) are not effective, since the data are so limited, (2) wearing a cloth mask or face covering is better than doing nothing, (3) the article is being used by individuals and groups to support non-mask wearing where mandated and (4) there are now many modeling studies suggesting that cloth masks or face coverings could be effective at flattening the curve and preventing many cases of infection.

Advertisement

You know, maybe we’re putting too much faith in masks to stop this thing? Just a thought:

Also, it appears this mask requirement doesn’t apply equally:

Of course not.

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement