Sheer Panda-monium in China: Taizhou Zoo Unveils Unique New 'Panda Exhibit'
Politico: ‘Swagger’ Was Once Journalism’s Calling Card
AGHamilton Shares Poignant and Personal Insight into the Jewish Experience After October 7
Brian Krassenstein Tries to White Knight for Kathy Hochul After Racist Computer Remark
Randi Weingarten Horrified by School Closures - In Gaza
John Fetterman Should Be Awarded Ownership of TikTok After this Sick Twitter Burn
Politico: Biden Administration Holding Up Delivery of Bombs to Israel to Send a...
John Kirby Says You Can't Eliminate Hamas Through Military Operations
Kristi Noem and Fox Host Engage in Heated Verbal Sparring Match About her...
What Could POSSIBLY Go Wrong?! Denver Sets Up Hotline for Residents to Host...
Biden: Not Only Did Illegal Immigrants Build This Country, They’re Also Model Citizens
One of Biden's Illegal Immigrants Picked the Wrong State to Terrorize a Young...
WOMP WOMP: Jeff Bezos Invested $60 MILLION in Florida Lab-Grown Meat Before DeSantis...
Northwestern Teaching Assistant Blames 'the Jews' for the Latest Crop of Anti-Semites
Donald Trump's Classified Documents Case Delayed 'Indefinitely'

Swing and a Miss: NYT Faceplants on Christmas Day with Attempted Hit Piece on Clarence Thomas

Twitter

While most people were enjoying Christmas presents and feasts with family, friends, and loved ones yesterday, the perpetually miserable folks at The New York Times decided to launch yet another attack on conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. 

Advertisement

Thomas' crime this time? Apparently, he hires qualified and ambitious clerks who then go on to successful careers in the law, politics, entertainment, and other fields. 

We know. The horror, right? 

Thomas has served on SCOTUS since 1991. Each year, a justice is entitled to four clerks (though the Chief Justice is allowed to add a fifth). But the New York Times seems really upset that of Thomas' approximately 140 clerks, most of them are not only very successful but also very loyal to their former boss and share his political views. Shocking. 

Thomas' list of clerks IS impressive. It includes many current federal judges, law school professors and deans, partners in law firms, and more. Fox News host Laura Ingraham is also a former Thomas clerk. Senator Mike Lee, who actually clerked under Justice Scalia, is named by the Times as a Thomas 'adopted clerk' (we imagine it's because they think that's scary or something and because they hate Mike Lee too, not to mention the idea of adoption).

Advertisement

We don't know about you, but it sounds to us like Thomas knows how to pick quality people.

We all know why. They hate him. And here's the reason: 

Seems pretty racist of them, doesn't it? 

They're not. They're really, really, fundamentally not. 

It must completely destroy the media that Thomas is completely unphased by any of their hit pieces on him. And, of course, that's just another reason to laugh at them. 

Advertisement

The New York Times fires people for letting a sitting U.S. Senator write an op-ed in their pages, so no. We don't expect them to know anything about loyalty, integrity, or any other qualities of a good boss. 

They only sound like that because they are that.

We don't think they're even trying to hide it anymore. If they are, they're not very good at it. 

That monster. 

In fairness, they DO need a new word. 'Pounce' and 'seize' are getting pretty worn out. 

But the language in the tweet and the article is hilarious. Former clerks of Thomas are 'agents,' and they constitute 'an army of influential acolytes.' (No, we did not make that up; that phrase is actually in the article.) Thomas himself exercises an 'idiosyncratic brand of conservative legal thinking' (what does that even mean?), and the Times tries to paint the fact that he stays in touch with all of his former clerks as some kind of Star Chamber type of secret society.

Advertisement

It's all quite insane. But also mockable. 

It's always funny when the media believes that people still play by their rules, where they tell us what to think about something or someone and we dutifully listen to them. 

Those rules are long gone. The opposite is more the truth these days. And if the media is upset about that, all they need is a good mirror to discover who destroyed their trustworthiness and credibility. 

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement