‘Fake News’ Death Rattle: CNN Posts Lowest Year-Long Audience Averages in Its History
Folk Hero: Scott Jennings Catches Flack for Mocking the Left’s Love Affair with...
Where’s the Money? Kamala Campaign Fundraiser’s Shocking Defection from Dem Party Cult
Discomfort and Joy: Christmas Pay Cut Arrives for MSNBC’s Ridiculous ReidOut Host
Grounded Monkeys: Scott Adams Praises Biden for Destroying Dem Party and Clipping Legacy...
‘I Like My Suitcase!’: Viral Barron Trump Dance Club Track and Paris Hilton,...
Convicted Murderer Complains He Had a White Jury, and That's Not Law, It's...
President Trump Has Been President for Over a Month and Hasn't Done One...
Weaponization Committee Issues Report on the 'Censorship-Industrial Complex'
Report: Boy Rubs Himself With Lotion in Girls' Locker Room to 'Prevent Chafing'
GENDER BIAS: End Wokeness Points Out Misleading Graphic on Homelessness
Wajahat Ali Wants to ‘F Elon Musk and His Ghouls to the Lowest...
Despicable: Joe Biden Kept Families of Fallen Marines Waiting Hours While He Napped...
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse Still Working on Racially Integrating His Beach Club
It's Not About the Climate: Activists Throw Paint on a Tesla to Stick...

Bluff Called: Marsha Blackburn Files Bevy of Subpoenas ... Including One For Epstein Flight Logs

On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing to consider two Biden administration judicial nominees, but also to consider Chairman Dick Durbin's request for subpoenas of Harlan Crow and Leonard Leo as part of their 'ethics investigation' into Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. We won't delve into the details of that investigation, but it is fueled by left-wing dark money and seeks to punish Thomas for matters that are not, in fact, ethics violations. More broadly, it attacks the independent nature of the Judiciary Branch itself. 

Advertisement

Needless to say, the Republicans in the committee were having none of this. Ranking member Lindsey Graham started the responses to Durbin's request by promising many amendments that would make these two subpoenas untenable for the committee. 

But it was Sen. Marcha Blackburn who stole the show with her list of subpoenas that she was filing to add to the subpoenas Durbin requested. Watch:

Blackburn's subpoena amendments were like kryptonite to Democrats. They included: 

  • a subpoena to Justice Sotomayor's staff regarding her earnings from book sales and speaking engagements,
  • a subpoena for HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra to explain how he lost track of 85,000 migrant children, 
  • a subpoena to the DOJ over its decision to terminate a program aimed at rooting out Chinese spies in the U.S.,
  • a subpoena to Robert Mueller’s staff over his targeting of former President Donald Trump, and 
  • a subpoena to the DOJ and FTC over their investigation of Elon Musk.

But one subpoena she filed grabbed everyone's attention: a subpoena to the estate of Jeffrey Epstein to obtain his flight logs.

And boy, did that get people to sit up straight and take notice. 

Advertisement

Of course, in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, some of those flight logs were already released, but only up to 2013. Blackburn's subpoena was for all of the flight logs.

'Given the numerous allegations of human trafficking and sexual abuse surrounding Mr. Epstein,' Blackburn said, 'I think it is very important that we identify everybody that was on that plane, and how many trips they took on that plane, and the destinations to which they arrived.'

Of course, not everyone on Twitter/X was all that optimistic. 

Still others shared their concerns for Blackburn herself. 

Of course, Blackburn alone can't just issue those subpoenas, they have to be issued by the committee. But Durbin can't issue them without Republicans' consent either. It is good to see that some of those Republicans realize that they still have a considerable degree of power, and these subpoenas are one of their weapons. Democrats cannot pursue Durbin's subpoenas without also considering Blackburn's and all of the other 88 amendments that Republicans filed. 

Advertisement

Shockingly -- yet conveniently -- Durbin gaveled the hearing to a close without considering any of the subpoenas, including his own. He promised to consider them again at an unspecified 'future date.'

No matter what happens, it's good to see Blackburn playing hardball and putting Durbin between a rock and a hard place on his Clarence Thomas obsession. 

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement